AIM: To estimate whether pretreatment serum iron levels, the HIC (hepatic iron concentration) and the distribution of hepatic iron identify the long-term "responders" and "non-responders" to therapy with peg-IFN and RBV, and whether the addition of phlebotomy could increase the likelihood of therapeutic response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 45 subjects with chronic hepatitis C were taking peg-IFN alpha-2a 180 microg once a week and RBV 1000 mg/die. The "responders" continued therapy with peg-IFN plus RBV, while, the "non-responders" were subjected to phlebotomy. After two weeks and subsequently every month the patients were subjected to blood test and clinical appraisal. RESULTS: Hepatic iron storage meaningfully conditions the outcome of therapy with peg-IFN and RBV, its reduction by phlebotomy favourably correlates with response to treatment and, at last, the semiquantitative histological appraisal would have to be included in the pre-treatment work-up of patients with chronic hepatitis C. CONCLUSIONS: The study results, even though obtained on a small size of cases, allow to conclude that serum corporeal iron evaluation underestimates the real hepatic iron concentration; the hepatic iron concentration, in turn, negatively conditions the response to therapy with peg-IFN and RBV (by reducing the percentage of the fast virological response). Lastly, iron removal by phlebotomy favourably correlates with the response to treatment.
AIM: To estimate whether pretreatment serum iron levels, the HIC (hepatic iron concentration) and the distribution of hepatic iron identify the long-term "responders" and "non-responders" to therapy with peg-IFN and RBV, and whether the addition of phlebotomy could increase the likelihood of therapeutic response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 45 subjects with chronic hepatitis C were taking peg-IFN alpha-2a 180 microg once a week and RBV 1000 mg/die. The "responders" continued therapy with peg-IFN plus RBV, while, the "non-responders" were subjected to phlebotomy. After two weeks and subsequently every month the patients were subjected to blood test and clinical appraisal. RESULTS: Hepatic iron storage meaningfully conditions the outcome of therapy with peg-IFN and RBV, its reduction by phlebotomy favourably correlates with response to treatment and, at last, the semiquantitative histological appraisal would have to be included in the pre-treatment work-up of patients with chronic hepatitis C. CONCLUSIONS: The study results, even though obtained on a small size of cases, allow to conclude that serum corporeal iron evaluation underestimates the real hepatic iron concentration; the hepatic iron concentration, in turn, negatively conditions the response to therapy with peg-IFN and RBV (by reducing the percentage of the fast virological response). Lastly, iron removal by phlebotomy favourably correlates with the response to treatment.