Literature DB >> 18061275

Mechanomyographic amplitude and mean power frequency responses during isometric ramp vs. step muscle actions.

Eric D Ryan1, Travis W Beck, Trent J Herda, Michael J Hartman, Jeffrey R Stout, Terry J Housh, Joel T Cramer.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare the mechanomyographic amplitude (MMG(RMS)) and mean power frequency (MMG(MPF)) vs. torque relationships during isometric ramp and step muscle actions for the vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris (RF) muscles. Nineteen subjects (mean+/-S.D. age=24+/-4 years) performed 2 isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) before and after 2 or 3 isometric ramp muscle actions from (5-95% MVC) to 9 submaximal step muscle actions (15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, and 95% MVC). MMG signals were recorded from the VL and RF muscles, and MMG(RMS) and MMG(MPF) values were computed for each corresponding percentage of the MVC. Absolute and normalized MMG(RMS) and MMG(MPF) vs. torque relationships were analyzed and interpreted on a subject-by-subject and composite pattern basis using polynomial regression and repeated measures ANOVAs. For MMG(RMS) and MMG(MPF), only 16-53% and 11-26% of the individual responses were consistent with the composite polynomial models, respectively. In addition, the normalized composite MMG(RMS) values were greater for the RF than the VL from 35 to 85% MVC. Only 47% of the MMG(RMS) and 5% of the MMG(MPF) individual patterns of responses were the same for the ramp and step muscle actions, and differences were also observed for the composite MMG(RMS) and MMG(MPF) patterns between the ramp and step muscle actions. Overall, these findings indicated that the torque-related patterns of responses for MMG(RMS) and MMG(MPF) were different among subjects (i.e., inter-individual variability) and were muscle- (VL vs. RF) and mode-specific (ramp vs. step).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18061275     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  9 in total

1.  Estimation of elbow flexion force during isometric muscle contraction from mechanomyography and electromyography.

Authors:  Wonkeun Youn; Jung Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Muscle-related differences in mechanomyography frequency-force relationships are model dependent.

Authors:  Trent J Herda; Michael A Cooper
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Endurance training alters motor unit activation strategies for the vastus lateralis, yet sex-related differences and relationships with muscle size remain.

Authors:  Stephanie A Sontag; Michael A Trevino; Trent J Herda; Adam J Sterczala; Jonathan D Miller; Mandy E Parra; Hannah L Dimmick; Jake Deckert
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Force control deficits in chronic stroke: grip formation and release phases.

Authors:  Sagar K Naik; Carolynn Patten; Neha Lodha; Stephen A Coombes; James H Cauraugh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sonomyographic responses during voluntary isometric ramp contraction of the human rectus femoris muscle.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Yong-Ping Zheng; Jing-Yi Guo; Zhenyu Zhu; Shing-Chow Chan; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  The influence of chronic training status on the mechanical behavior of the vastus lateralis during repetitive trapezoidal contractions.

Authors:  Alex A Olmos; Trent J Herda; Stephanie A Sontag; Michael A Trevino
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.864

7.  Mechanomyography-based muscle fatigue detection during electrically elicited cycling in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jannatul Naeem; Nur Azah Hamzaid; Md Anamul Islam; Amelia Wong Azman; Manfred Bijak
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Mechanomyographic parameter extraction methods: an appraisal for clinical applications.

Authors:  Morufu Olusola Ibitoye; Nur Azah Hamzaid; Jorge M Zuniga; Nazirah Hasnan; Ahmad Khairi Abdul Wahab
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Surface mechanomyography and electromyography provide non-invasive indices of inspiratory muscle force and activation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Manuel Lozano-García; Leonardo Sarlabous; John Moxham; Gerrard F Rafferty; Abel Torres; Raimon Jané; Caroline J Jolley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.