Richard Y Hwang1, Lixian Zhong2, Yifan Xu3, Trevor Johnson1, Feng Zhang4,5, Karl Deisseroth4,5, W Daniel Tracey3,1,6. 1. Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710. 2. Department of Pharmacology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710. 4. Department of Bioengineering, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; 27710. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305. 6. Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Natural selection has resulted in a complex and fascinating repertoire of innate behaviors that are produced by insects. One puzzling example occurs in fruit fly larvae that have been subjected to a noxious mechanical or thermal sensory input. In response, the larvae "roll" with a motor pattern that is completely distinct from the style of locomotion that is used for foraging. RESULTS: We have precisely mapped the sensory neurons that are used by the Drosophila larvae to detect nociceptive stimuli. By using complementary optogenetic activation and targeted silencing of sensory neurons, we have demonstrated that a single class of neuron (class IV multidendritic neuron) is sufficient and necessary for triggering the unusual rolling behavior. In addition, we find that larvae have an innately encoded preference in the directionality of rolling. Surprisingly, the initial direction of rolling locomotion is toward the side of the body that has been stimulated. We propose that directional rolling might provide a selective advantage in escape from parasitoid wasps that are ubiquitously present in the natural environment of Drosophila. Consistent with this hypothesis, we have documented that larvae can escape the attack of Leptopilina boulardi parasitoid wasps by rolling, occasionally flipping the attacker onto its back. CONCLUSIONS: The class IV multidendritic neurons of Drosophila larvae are nociceptive. The nociception behavior of Drosophila melanagaster larvae includes an innately encoded directional preference. Nociception behavior is elicited by the ecologically relevant sensory stimulus of parasitoid wasp attack.
BACKGROUND: Natural selection has resulted in a complex and fascinating repertoire of innate behaviors that are produced by insects. One puzzling example occurs in fruit fly larvae that have been subjected to a noxious mechanical or thermal sensory input. In response, the larvae "roll" with a motor pattern that is completely distinct from the style of locomotion that is used for foraging. RESULTS: We have precisely mapped the sensory neurons that are used by the Drosophila larvae to detect nociceptive stimuli. By using complementary optogenetic activation and targeted silencing of sensory neurons, we have demonstrated that a single class of neuron (class IV multidendritic neuron) is sufficient and necessary for triggering the unusual rolling behavior. In addition, we find that larvae have an innately encoded preference in the directionality of rolling. Surprisingly, the initial direction of rolling locomotion is toward the side of the body that has been stimulated. We propose that directional rolling might provide a selective advantage in escape from parasitoid wasps that are ubiquitously present in the natural environment of Drosophila. Consistent with this hypothesis, we have documented that larvae can escape the attack of Leptopilina boulardi parasitoid wasps by rolling, occasionally flipping the attacker onto its back. CONCLUSIONS: The class IV multidendritic neurons of Drosophila larvae are nociceptive. The nociception behavior of Drosophila melanagaster larvae includes an innately encoded directional preference. Nociception behavior is elicited by the ecologically relevant sensory stimulus of parasitoid wasp attack.
Authors: Xiang Li; Davina V Gutierrez; M Gartz Hanson; Jing Han; Melanie D Mark; Hillel Chiel; Peter Hegemann; Lynn T Landmesser; Stefan Herlitze Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-11-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Feng Zhang; Li-Ping Wang; Martin Brauner; Jana F Liewald; Kenneth Kay; Natalie Watzke; Phillip G Wood; Ernst Bamberg; Georg Nagel; Alexander Gottschalk; Karl Deisseroth Journal: Nature Date: 2007-04-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Georg Nagel; Tanjef Szellas; Wolfram Huhn; Suneel Kateriya; Nona Adeishvili; Peter Berthold; Doris Ollig; Peter Hegemann; Ernst Bamberg Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Roger Lopez-Bellido; Stephanie Puig; Patrick J Huang; Chang-Ru Tsai; Heather N Turner; Michael J Galko; Howard B Gutstein Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Logan T Schachtner; Ismail E Sola; Daniel Forand; Simona Antonacci; Adam J Postovit; Nathan T Mortimer; Darrell J Killian; Eugenia C Olesnicky Journal: Dev Genes Evol Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 0.900
Authors: Connie Yan; Fei Wang; Yun Peng; Claire R Williams; Brian Jenkins; Jill Wildonger; Hyeon-Jin Kim; Jonathan B Perr; Joshua C Vaughan; Megan E Kern; Michael R Falvo; E Timothy O'Brien; Richard Superfine; John C Tuthill; Yang Xiang; Stephen L Rogers; Jay Z Parrish Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Nathaniel J Himmel; Jamin M Letcher; Akira Sakurai; Thomas R Gray; Maggie N Benson; Daniel N Cox Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 6.237