Literature DB >> 18060723

Performance of Binax NOW Flu A and B and direct fluorescent assay in comparison with a composite of viral culture or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for detection of influenza infection during the 2006 to 2007 season.

Mahbubur Rahman1, Mary F Vandermause, Burney A Kieke, Edward A Belongia.   

Abstract

The Binax NOW Flu A and Flu B (Binax NOW), direct fluorescent assay (DFA), and viral culture were evaluated and compared with a composite of viral culture or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Participants with medically attended acute respiratory illness were identified through active surveillance during the 2006 to 2007 season, and consenting individuals (n=932) were tested for influenza by culture and RT-PCR. Physicians ordered a rapid antigen test (Binax NOW [n=73] or DFA [n=70]) according to their clinical judgment. The Binax NOW detected 11 of 18 influenza infections (sensitivity, 61%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 36-83%), whereas DFA detected 17 of 21 influenza infections (sensitivity 81%, 95% CI, 58-95%). Compared with culture/RT-PCR, specificity of both Binax NOW and DFA was 100%. During the 2006 to 2007 influenza season, DFA and Binax NOW demonstrated high specificity but failed to identify a substantial proportion of influenza infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18060723     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  10 in total

1.  Gene expression signatures diagnose influenza and other symptomatic respiratory viral infections in humans.

Authors:  Aimee K Zaas; Minhua Chen; Jay Varkey; Timothy Veldman; Alfred O Hero; Joseph Lucas; Yongsheng Huang; Ronald Turner; Anthony Gilbert; Robert Lambkin-Williams; N Christine Øien; Bradly Nicholson; Stephen Kingsmore; Lawrence Carin; Christopher W Woods; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 21.023

2.  A meta-analysis of point-of-care laboratory tests in the diagnosis of novel 2009 swine-lineage pandemic influenza A (H1N1).

Authors:  Steven M Babin; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Richard E Rothman; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 3.  Cell Culture, Technology: Enhancing the Culture of Diagnosing Human Diseases.

Authors:  Shuaibu Abdullahi Hudu; Ahmed Subeh Alshrari; Ahmad Syahida; Zamberi Sekawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

4.  Is the interpretation of rapid antigen testing for respiratory syncytial virus as simple as positive or negative?

Authors:  Paul Walsh; Christina Overmyer; Christine Hancock; Jacquelyn Heffner; Nicholas Walker; Thienphuc Nguyen; Lucas Shanholtzer; Enrique Caldera; James Pusavat; Eli Mordechai; Martin E Adelson; Kathryn T Iacono
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Synthesis of novel N-acetylneuraminic acid derivatives as substrates for rapid detection of influenza virus neuraminidase.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Xiaoyu Liu; Xiaoxia Peng; Pei Li; Tianxin Wang; Guihua Tai; X James Li; Yifa Zhou
Journal:  Carbohydr Res       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Comparison of viral isolation and multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR for confirmation of respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus detection by antigen immunoassays.

Authors:  R S Liao; L L Tomalty; A Majury; D E Zoutman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Non-invasive sample collection for respiratory virus testing by multiplex PCR.

Authors:  Anne J Blaschke; Mandy A Allison; Lindsay Meyers; Margarita Rogatcheva; Caroline Heyrend; Brittany Mallin; Marjorie Carter; Bonnie Lafleur; Trenda Barney; Mark A Poritz; Judy A Daly; Carrie L Byington
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.168

8.  Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of influenza pneumonia.

Authors:  Lucia Marzoratti; Hernán A Iannella; Victoria Fernández Gómez; Sandra B Figueroa
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.725

9.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of "test" versus "treat" patients hospitalized with suspected influenza in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Joyce H S You; Eva S K Chan; Maggie Y K Leung; Margaret Ip; Nelson L S Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Poor clinical sensitivity of rapid antigen test for influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus.

Authors:  Jan Felix Drexler; Angelika Helmer; Heike Kirberg; Ulrike Reber; Marcus Panning; Marcel Müller; Katja Höfling; Bertfried Matz; Christian Drosten; Anna Maria Eis-Hübinger
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.883

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.