Literature DB >> 18060450

Isolated spring wetlands in the Great Basin and Mojave deserts, USA: potential response of vegetation to groundwater withdrawal.

Duncan T Patten1, Leigh Rouse, Juliet C Stromberg.   

Abstract

Desert springs, often the sole sources of water for wildlife and cattle, support wetland and wetland/upland transition ecosystems including rare and endemic species. In the basin and range province in Nevada, USA, springs in the Great Basin and Mojave deserts are sustained by interconnected deep carbonate and shallow basin-fill aquifers which are threatened by proposed groundwater withdrawal to sustain rapidly expanding urban areas, a common problem in arid regions worldwide. This paper draws on historic groundwater data, groundwater modeling, and studies of environmental controls of spring ecosystems to speculate on the potential effects of groundwater withdrawal and water table decline on spring-supported vegetation. The focus is on springs in the Great Basin and Mojave deserts representative of those that may be affected by future, planned groundwater withdrawal. Groundwater withdrawal is expected to reduce spring discharge directly through reduced flows from the shallow basin-fill aquifer or through reduction of the hydraulic head of the deep carbonate aquifer. This flow reduction will truncate the outflow stream, reducing the areal cover of wetland and wetland/upland transition vegetation. Lowering the local water table may also reduce the amount of upland phreatophytic vegetation by causing water levels to drop below plant rooting depths. Percolation of salts to surface soils may be reduced, eventually altering desert shrub cover from halophytes to nonhalophytes. The extent of these effects will vary among springs, based on their distance from extraction sites and location relative to regional groundwater flow paths. On-site monitoring of biotic variables (including cover of selected hygrophytes and phreatophytes) should be a necessary complement to the planned monitoring of local hydrologic conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18060450     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-007-9035-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

Review 1.  Phreatophytic vegetation and groundwater fluctuations: a review of current research and application of ecosystem response modeling with an emphasis on great basin vegetation.

Authors:  Elke Naumburg; Ricardo Mata-Gonzalez; Rachael G Hunter; Terry McLendon; David W Martin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots.

Authors:  M M Caldwell; J H Richards
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Hydraulic lift: Substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots.

Authors:  J H Richards; M M Caldwell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale.

Authors:  J Canadell; R B Jackson; J B Ehleringer; H A Mooney; O E Sala; E-D Schulze
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Summer water relations of the desert phreatophyte Prosopis glandulosa in the Sonoran Desert of southern California.

Authors:  Erik T Nilsen; Philip W Rundel; M Rasoul Sharifi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Water potential and ionic effects on germination and seedling growth of two cold desert shrubs.

Authors:  G L Dodd; L A Donovan
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  Responses of Riparian Cottonwoods to Alluvial Water Table Declines.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Physiological and morphological response patterns of Populus deltoides to alluvial groundwater pumping.

Authors:  David J Cooper; Donald R D'Amico; Michael L Scott
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Status of the Riparian ecosystem in the upper San Pedro River, Arizona: application of an assessment model.

Authors:  Juliet C Stromberg; Sharon J Lite; Tyler J Rychener; Lainie R Levick; Mark D Dixon; Joseph M Watts
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 3.307

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Dynamic response of desert wetlands to abrupt climate change.

Authors:  Kathleen B Springer; Craig R Manker; Jeffrey S Pigati
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Solar energy development and aquatic ecosystems in the southwestern United States: potential impacts, mitigation, and research needs.

Authors:  Mark Grippo; John W Hayse; Ben L O'Connor
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Mapping groundwater dependent ecosystems in California.

Authors:  Jeanette Howard; Matt Merrifield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparison of Landsat and Land-Based Phenology Camera Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for Dominant Plant Communities in the Great Basin.

Authors:  Keirith A Snyder; Justin L Huntington; Bryce L Wehan; Charles G Morton; Tamzen K Stringham
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Collapse of a desert bird community over the past century driven by climate change.

Authors:  Kelly J Iknayan; Steven R Beissinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.