OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether hypoxemic resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock prevents the late circulatory instability and attenuates the oxidative and inflammatory responses associated with the standard strategy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized, controlled animal study in an experimental laboratory of a university intensive care unit. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one New Zealand white rabbits weighting 3.1-3.4 kg INTERVENTIONS: Anesthetized animals were subjected to hemorrhagic shock by exsanguinations to a mean arterial pressure of 40 mmHg for 60 min. Resuscitation was performed by reinfusing the shed blood for 30 min under normoxemia (PaO(2) 95-105 mmHg, control group, n=10) or hypoxemia (PaO(2) 35-40 mmHg, hypox-res group, n=10); Ringer's lactate was given from 30 to 60 min to restore arterial pressure within baseline values. A sham group was assigned (n=11). Animals were recorded for 120 min postresuscitation and for further 360 min to assess the early mortality rate. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Hypoxemic resuscitation compared with normoxemic resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock was associated with (a) a better hemodynamic condition assessed by the gradual restoration of blood pressure, higher urinary output associated with less fluid infusion; (b) lower reactive oxygen species production assessed by the reduced blood geometric mean fluorescence intensity, lower malondialdehyde, and higher ratio of reduced to total glutathione levels; (c) attenuation in the plasma concentrations of IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-6; and (d) no difference in mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxemic resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock is more efficient than normoxemic in restoring the blood pressure and in attenuating the excessive oxidative and inflammatory responses observed during normoxemic resuscitation.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether hypoxemic resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock prevents the late circulatory instability and attenuates the oxidative and inflammatory responses associated with the standard strategy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, randomized, controlled animal study in an experimental laboratory of a university intensive care unit. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one New Zealand white rabbits weighting 3.1-3.4 kg INTERVENTIONS: Anesthetized animals were subjected to hemorrhagic shock by exsanguinations to a mean arterial pressure of 40 mmHg for 60 min. Resuscitation was performed by reinfusing the shed blood for 30 min under normoxemia (PaO(2) 95-105 mmHg, control group, n=10) or hypoxemia (PaO(2) 35-40 mmHg, hypox-res group, n=10); Ringer's lactate was given from 30 to 60 min to restore arterial pressure within baseline values. A sham group was assigned (n=11). Animals were recorded for 120 min postresuscitation and for further 360 min to assess the early mortality rate. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Hypoxemic resuscitation compared with normoxemic resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock was associated with (a) a better hemodynamic condition assessed by the gradual restoration of blood pressure, higher urinary output associated with less fluid infusion; (b) lower reactive oxygen species production assessed by the reduced blood geometric mean fluorescence intensity, lower malondialdehyde, and higher ratio of reduced to total glutathione levels; (c) attenuation in the plasma concentrations of IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-6; and (d) no difference in mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxemic resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock is more efficient than normoxemic in restoring the blood pressure and in attenuating the excessive oxidative and inflammatory responses observed during normoxemic resuscitation.
Authors: E E Douzinas; E Patsouris; E M Kypriades; D J Makris; I Andrianakis; P Korkolopoulou; V Boursinos; A Papalois; C Sotiropoulou; P Davaris; C Roussos Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Emmanuel E Douzinas; Olga Livaditi; Anastasios G Xiarchos; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Vassiliki Villiotou; Ioannis A Liappas; Evangelos Evangelou; Alexandros D Rapidis; Charis Roussos Journal: J Trauma Date: 2006-10
Authors: Erika Haase; David L Bigam; Quentin B Nakonechny; Laurence D Jewell; Gregory Korbutt; Po-Yin Cheung Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: E E Douzinas; O Livaditi; M-K Tasoulis; A Pelekanou; E J Giamarellos-Bourboulis Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-01-06 Impact factor: 17.440