Literature DB >> 18059232

A comprehensive study of nondysplastic and dysplastic serrated polyps of the vermiform appendix.

Rhonda K Yantiss1, Andrea Panczykowski, Joseph Misdraji, Hejin P Hahn, Robert D Odze, Hanna Rennert, Yao-Tseng Chen.   

Abstract

Serrated colorectal polyps often show DNA hypermethylation and/or BRAF mutations and have been implicated in the "serrated neoplastic pathway." Although similar lesions occur in the appendix, they have never been systematically investigated. We evaluated a study group of 56 serrated polyps, a control group of 17 mucinous cystadenomas, and 4 adenocarcinomas with adjacent serrated polyps of the appendix to better understand their pathogenesis. The study cases were classified as nondysplastic or dysplastic serrated polyps and evaluated for MLH-1, MSH-2, MGMT, beta-catenin, p53, and Ki-67 expression, BRAF and KRAS mutations, and microsatellite instability. Serrated polyps usually occurred in older adults with no sex predilection. Most (59%) lacked dysplasia, but all showed similar molecular features, regardless of the degree of dysplasia present. Decreased MLH-1 (50%, P<0.001) and/or MGMT (59%, P<0.001) expression and BRAF (29%, P=0.007) mutations were significantly more common in serrated polyps, but BRAF mutations were detected in a minority of the extracted DNA in 15/16 cases. Of the 28 cases with decreased MLH-1 expression, none showed high-frequency microsatellite instability. Loss of MLH-1 (25%) or MGMT (50%) expression and BRAF or KRAS mutations (50%) were inconsistently present in adenocarcinomas and were not identified in combination in any cases. We conclude that molecular features of the "serrated neoplastic pathway" are present with similar frequencies among dysplastic and nondysplastic serrated appendiceal polyps and are not highly prevalent in adjacent carcinomas. These features, including BRAF mutations, may be more closely related to a serrated morphology in appendiceal polyps rather than biologically important changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18059232     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31806bee6d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  9 in total

1.  DNA damage response and its clinicopathological relationship in appendiceal tumors.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Yajima; Ryuichi Wada; Yutaka Matsuzaki; Soroku Yagihashi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  An appendiceal neoplastic lesion: case report and implications for colonoscopic screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Hugh J Freeman; Douglas L Webber; Adam T Meneghetti
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  High-level microsatellite instability in appendiceal carcinomas.

Authors:  Melissa W Taggart; John Galbincea; Paul F Mansfield; Keith F Fournier; Richard E Royal; Michael J Overman; Asif Rashid; Susan C Abraham
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Molecular profiling of appendiceal serrated lesions, polyps and mucinous neoplasms: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Giada Munari; Gianluca Businello; Paola Mattiolo; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Matteo Fassan; Gianmaria Pennelli; Marta Sbaraglia; Chiara Borga; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Gaya Spolverato; Claudia Mescoli; Francesca Galuppini; Antonio Sommariva; Elena Bellan; Sara Lonardi; Fotios Loupakis; Claudio Luchini
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma associated with adjacent sessile serrated lesion of the appendix vermiform: a case report.

Authors:  Osamu Kinoshita; Yasutoshi Murayama; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Chohei Sakakura; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Case Rep Pathol       Date:  2014-07-09

6.  Immunohistochemistry - microarray analysis of patients with peritoneal metastases of appendiceal or colorectal origin.

Authors:  Danielle E Green; Thejus T Jayakrishnan; Michael Hwang; Sam G Pappas; T Clark Gamblin; Kiran K Turaga
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-01-05

7.  Overinterpretation is common in pathological diagnosis of appendix cancer during patient referral for oncologic care.

Authors:  Mark A Valasek; Irene Thung; Esha Gollapalle; Alexey A Hodkoff; Kaitlyn J Kelly; Joel M Baumgartner; Vera Vavinskaya; Grace Y Lin; Ann P Tipps; Mojgan V Hosseini; Andrew M Lowy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differential diagnosis of appendiceal serrated lesions and polyps and low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: analysis of 88 cases.

Authors:  Yiyan Lu; Changhai Qi; Hongbin Xu; Mulan Jin
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Significance of the Entire Appendiceal Evaluation in the Diagnosis of Serrated Lesions, Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm, and Appendiceal Diverticulosis Disease.

Authors:  Fang Li; Yiyan Lu; Fang Hou; Ruiqing Ma; Dezhong Wang; Changhai Qi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.