Literature DB >> 18058900

Evaluation of methods to reduce formaldehyde levels of cadavers in the dissection laboratory.

Mark C Whitehead1, Maria C Savoia.   

Abstract

Dissection of conventionally embalmed cadavers exposes students, staff, and faculty to formaldehyde, a probable carcinogen. Therefore, prudent practices should seek to minimize formaldehyde exposure. In this study, we evaluated two commercially available chemicals, InfuTrace and Perfect Solution, for their effectiveness in reducing ambient formaldehyde levels. Four cadavers embalmed conventionally with formaldehyde and/or with the above agents were compared for their formaldehyde levels under conditions that strictly controlled for air circulation and for locations and methods of testing, and during activities that simulated student dissecting. For InfuTrace, one cadaver was reinfused with InfuTrace after initial standard perfusion with formaldehyde; a second cadaver had InfuTrace injected into the thoracic and abdominal body cavities after formaldehyde perfusion. For Perfect Solution, the product was used for embalming a third cadaver in lieu of formaldehyde. For a control, a fourth cadaver was embalmed with the standard formaldehyde solution. Testing of personal and ambient room air samples and of fluid obtained from the cadavers was performed and analyzed in a blinded fashion. Results indicated that both Perfect Solution, substituted for standard formaldehyde embalming, and InfuTrace infused through the vasculature after formaldehyde embalming, resulted in lower concentrations of formaldehyde than embalming with formaldehyde solution alone or in combination with body cavity injection of InfuTrace. These differences in formaldehyde concentrations are consistent across measuring methods, for example, of room air, of breathing zone air during cadaver handling and dissection, and of liquid samples obtained from the cadavers. Perfect Solution yielded suboptimum fixation and a different texture, color, and smell than the formaldehyde treatments. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18058900     DOI: 10.1002/ca.20567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  5 in total

1.  Formaldehyde exposure in gross anatomy laboratory of Suranaree University of Technology: a comparison of area and personal sampling.

Authors:  Naruwan Saowakon; Piyada Ngernsoungnern; Pornpun Watcharavitoon; Apichart Ngernsoungnern; Rachain Kosanlavit
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The Anatomy to Genomics (ATG) Start Genetics medical school initiative: incorporating exome sequencing data from cadavers used for Anatomy instruction into the first year curriculum.

Authors:  Glenn S Gerhard; Qunyan Jin; Barbara V Paynton; Steven N Popoff
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.063

3.  Neutralizing formaldehyde in chicken cadaver with urea and urea fertilizer solution.

Authors:  Le Ngoc Ninh; Sirikachorn Tangkawattana; Peerapol Sukon; Naoki Takahashi; Kazushige Takehana; Prasarn Tangkawattana
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 1.267

4.  Morphological validation of a novel bi-material 3D-printed model of temporal bone for middle ear surgery education.

Authors:  Jordan Chauvelot; Cedric Laurent; Gaël Le Coz; Jean-Philippe Jehl; Nguyen Tran; Marta Szczetynska; Abdelhadi Moufki; Anne-Sophie Bonnet; Cecile Parietti-Winkler
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

5.  Phenoxyethanol-Based Embalming for Anatomy Teaching: An 18 Years' Experience with Crosado Embalming at the University of Otago in New Zealand.

Authors:  Brynley Crosado; Sabine Löffler; Benjamin Ondruschka; Ming Zhang; Johann Zwirner; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.958

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.