Literature DB >> 18058452

Sodium dodecyl sulfate allows the persistence and recovery of biofilms of Pseudomonas fluorescens formed under different hydrodynamic conditions.

Manuel Simões1, Lúcia C Simões, Maria O Pereira, Maria J Vieira.   

Abstract

The effect of the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) on Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms was investigated using flow cell reactors with stainless steel substrata, under turbulent (Re = 5200) and laminar (Re = 2000) flow. Steady-state biofilms were exposed to SDS in single doses (0.5, 1, 3 and 7 mM) and biofilm respiratory activity and mass measured at 0, 3, 7 and 12 h after the SDS application. The effect of SDS on biofilm mechanical stability was assessed using a rotating bioreactor. Whilst high concentrations (7 mM) of SDS promoted significant biofilm inactivation, it did not significantly reduce biofouling. Turbulent and laminar flow-generated biofilms had comparable susceptibility to SDS application. Following SDS exposure, biofilms rapidly recovered over the following 12 h, achieving higher respiratory activity values than before treatment. This phenomenon of post-treatment recovery was more pronounced for turbulent flow-generated biofilms, with an increase in SDS concentration. The mechanical stability of the biofilms increased with surfactant application, except for SDS concentrations near the critical micellar concentration, as measured by biofilm removal due to an increase in external shear stress forces. The data suggest that although SDS exerts antimicrobial action against P. fluorescens biofilms, even if only partial and reversible, it had only limited antifouling efficacy, increasing biofilm mechanical stability at low concentrations and allowing significant and rapid recovery of turbulent flow-generated biofilms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18058452     DOI: 10.1080/08927010701730311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofouling        ISSN: 0892-7014            Impact factor:   3.209


  4 in total

1.  Antibiofilm activity of Fmoc-phenylalanine against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Himanshi Singh; Avinash Gahane; Virender Singh; Shreya Ghosh; Ashwani Thakur
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and cell sorting of living bacteria.

Authors:  Giampiero Batani; Kristina Bayer; Julia Böge; Ute Hentschel; Torsten Thomas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Synthetic and biological surfactant effects on freshwater biofilm community composition and metabolic activity.

Authors:  Stephanie P Gill; William R Hunter; Laura E Coulson; Ibrahim M Banat; Jakob Schelker
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 5.560

4.  FSE-Ag complex NS: preparation and evaluation of antibacterial activity.

Authors:  Rahul S Kalhapure; Pradeep Bolla; Delfina C Dominguez; Amit Dahal; Sai H S Boddu; Jwala Renukuntla
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.847

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.