Literature DB >> 18058165

Controlled trials in aesthetic plastic surgery: a 16-year analysis.

A Becker1, A Blümle, G Antes, H Bannasch, N Torio-Padron, G B Stark, A Momeni.   

Abstract

Aesthetic surgery is one pillar of plastic surgery. Thus, not surprisingly, journals exist that focus predominantly on advances within this subspecialty. However, rarely has the process of systematic reviewing that identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) been conducted within this subspecialty. All original articles published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were analyzed to identify all RCTs and CCTs. The proportion of RCTs and CCTs in all original articles was determined, and the quality of reporting was assessed on the basis of established quality items. Additional parameters were investigated including reporting of statistically significant differences, type of institution, and country affiliation of the first author. Of the 1,048 original articles analyzed, 11 (1%) and 24 (2.3%) articles met the inclusion criteria for RCTs and CCTs, respectively. Only two studies were single blinded, whereas only one study reported on successful double blinding and appropriate allocation concealment. Notably, these trials were RCTs. Participant dropout was reported in one study. Statistically significant differences were reported in 18 trials, 6 of which were RCTs. The annual publication of RCTs has increased over the past 5 years. North America and Europe contributed a total of 28 controlled trials (80%). Controlled trials are being conducted in aesthetic surgery at a strikingly low rate. However, a recent increase in published RCTs reflects the recognition that performing outcome studies is pivotal in moving practice toward a foundation based on assessment by outcome. The quality of reporting, however, needs improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18058165     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-007-9075-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of reporting quality of the 2010 and 2012 National Surgical Congress oral presentations by CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer criteria.

Authors:  Mustafa Hasbahçeci; Fatih Başak; Ömer Uysal
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-09-01

2.  Quality of reporting according to the CONSORT, STROBE and Timmer instrument at the American Burn Association (ABA) annual meetings 2000 and 2008.

Authors:  Karsten Knobloch; Uzung Yoon; Hans O Rennekampff; Peter M Vogt
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Deficiencies of effectiveness of intervention studies in veterinary medicine: a cross-sectional survey of ten leading veterinary and medical journals.

Authors:  Nicola Di Girolamo; Reint Meursinge Reynders
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  AAPS Podium Presentations-Has the Level of Evidence Changed over the Past Decade?

Authors:  Arhana Chattopadhyay; Robin Wu; Derrick Wan; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-05-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.