Literature DB >> 18058115

Sagittal plane analysis of the open and closed methods in children with displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus (a radiological study).

Egemen Turhan1, Cemalettin Aksoy, Ahmet Ege, Ahmet Bayar, Selçuk Keser, Mümtaz Alpaslan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the radiological outcome of open and close reduction and osteosynthesis methods in the treatment of type II and III supracondylar humerus fractures in childhood with respect to the immediate post-operative reduction quality in sagittal plane.
METHOD: One hundred and forty four-pediatric patients with type IIb and III supracondylar humerus fractures treated at two centers between 1995 and 2005 were evaluated radiologically within a retrospective study. Seventy-six patients (54 boys, 22 girls, mean age 7.6, range 2-12) were treated by closed reduction and cross percutaneous pinning while 68 (49 boys, 19 girls, mean age 7.3, range 2-13) were treated by open reduction. The reduction quality of the open and closed groups was compared on immediate post-operative lateral radiographs by measuring of lateral humerocapitellar angle, anterior humeral line and anterior coronoid line criteria. The reduction quality was classified excellent, good, fair and poor according to the achievement of three, two, one or none of the criteria, respectively. Reductions classified as excellent and good were introduced as acceptable results.
RESULTS: At least one criterion was achieved in all the patients of both the groups. The mean humerocapitellar angle was 30.1 degrees in closed reduction group while the mean of it was 29.8 degrees in open reduced group. Radiograph of 48 (63.1%) patients with closed reduction were found to display the anterior humeral line intersecting the middle one-third of capitellum while this criteria was 45 (66%) in open reduction group. The anterior coronoid line was disturbed in three patients in each of both the groups. The reduction quality was evaluated to be excellent in 32 patients, good in 31, fair in 13 at the closed reduction group while these evaluations were 31, 20 and 17 in open reduction group, respectively. Successful reduction was achieved in 74.9% of the patients in closed reduction group and 75% of the patients in open reduction group.
CONCLUSION: It is concluded that there was no significant difference between closed and open reductions of pediatric displaced supracondylar fractures with regard to the radiological criteria of reduction quality in sagittal plane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18058115     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-007-0523-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  9 in total

1.  Proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Mark J Jo; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

2.  Importance of anterior humeral line for successful anatomical reduction in the surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.

Authors:  Takamasa Shimizu; Atsushi Yoshida; Shohei Omokawa; Tadanobu Onishi; Tsutomu Kira; Shigeru Santo; Hideo Hasewgawa; Kenji Kawamura; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-06-23

3.  Does open reduction and pinning affect outcome in severely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children? A systematic review.

Authors:  Juan Pretell-Mazzini; Juan Rodriguez-Martin; Eva María Andres-Esteban
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-07-15

4.  Timing of surgical treatment for type III supracondylar humerus fractures in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Ahmet Ozgur Yildirim; Vuslat Sema Unal; Ozdamar Fuad Oken; Murat Gulcek; Metin Ozsular; Ahmet Ucaner
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Triceps-sparing Posterior Approach for Supracondylar Humeral Fracture in Children.

Authors:  Saeed Kokly; Alessandro Castagna; Mehdi Aarabi
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-09

6.  Treatment of grossly dislocated supracondylar humerus fractures after failed closed reduction: a retrospective analysis of different surgical approaches.

Authors:  Paul Hagebusch; Daniel Anthony Koch; Philipp Faul; Yves Gramlich; Reinhard Hoffmann; Alexander Klug
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Triceps-sparing approach for open reduction and internal fixation of neglected displaced supracondylar and distal humeral fractures in children.

Authors:  Ahmed Shawkat Rizk
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-01-22

8.  Proximal humeral fractures: a review of current concepts.

Authors:  James C Widnall; Sujay K Dheerendra; Joby Jacob George Malal; Mohammed Waseem
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-09-06

9.  Radiographic assessments of pediatric supracondylar fractures and mid-term patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Francisco A Eguia; Caleb P Gottlich; Molly Vora; Walter Klyce; Sherif Hassan; Paul D Sponseller; R Jay Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.