Literature DB >> 1805806

Repeated measurement of maternal weight during pregnancy. Is this a useful practice?

M G Dawes1, J G Grudzinskas.   

Abstract

A retrospective study of 1092 pregnant women showed that the use of a centile chart of maternal weight gain was not effective at detecting women who give birth to small for gestational age (SGA) infants. Multiple regression analysis showed that of the various weight measurements recorded, weekly weight gain and maternal size at booking were the only factors which had a significant association with infant birthweight after taking into account maternal gestation, age, smoking habit and parity. Low maternal booking weight (less than 51 kg) was the most effective maternal weight measurement for antenatal detection of SGA infants (positive predictive value 20.0%). Low average weekly maternal weight gain (less than 0.20 kg) had a positive predictive value of only 12.9% for detecting these pregnancies. Weight loss or failure to gain weight over a 2-week interval occurring in the third trimester was observed in 46% of all women studied. Maternal smoking had a positive predictive value of 16.3% in antenatal detection of SGA infants. Maternal weight need be recorded only at booking, with the exception of patients in whom nutrition is of concern. The subsequent routine weighing of patients may produce unnecessary anxiety and should cease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1805806     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13367.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  16 in total

1.  Desktop laboratory technology for general practice.

Authors:  G K Freeman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Routine weighing in pregnancy.

Authors:  M G Dawes; J Green; H Ashurst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-22

3.  Routine weighing during antenatal visits.

Authors:  D L Dimperio; B H Frentzen; A C Cruz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-22

4.  Routine weighing during antenatal visits.

Authors:  J L Onwude; J G Thornton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-16

5.  Routine weighing during antenatal visits.

Authors:  K R Young
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-16

Review 6.  Assessment of weight changes during and after pregnancy: practical approaches.

Authors:  Amanda R Amorim; Yvonne Linné; Gilberto Kac; Paulo M Lourenço
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Prediction of excessive gestational weight gain from week-specific cutoff values: a cohort study.

Authors:  J Knabl; C Riedel; J Gmach; R Ensenauer; L Brandlhuber; K M Rasmussen; B Schiessl; R von Kries
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Is it worth weighing pregnant women in a developing country?

Authors:  X De Muylder
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  A mixed method study evaluating the integration of pregnancy weight gain charts into antenatal care.

Authors:  Susan de Jersey; Taylor Guthrie; Jeanette Tyler; Wan Yin Ling; Hilary Powlesland; Clare Byrne; Karen New
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  I am pregnant and want to do better but i can't: focus groups with low-income overweight and obese pregnant women.

Authors:  Mei-Wei Chang; Susan Nitzke; Diana Buist; Deborah Cain; Stefanie Horning; Kobra Eghtedary
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.