Literature DB >> 18057985

MR reproducibility in the assessment of uterine fibroids for patients scheduled for uterine artery embolization.

Nicole A Volkers1, Wouter J K Hehenkamp, Anje M Spijkerboer, Albert D Moolhuijzen, Erwin Birnie, Willem M Ankum, Jim A Reekers.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly applied in the evaluation of uterine fibroids. However, little is known about the reproducibility of MRI in the assessment of uterine fibroids. This study evaluates the inter- and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the uterine fibroids and concomitant adenomyosis in women scheduled for uterine artery embolization (UAE). Forty patients (mean age: 44.5 years) with symptomatic uterine fibroids who were scheduled for UAE underwent T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI. To study inter- and intraobserver agreement 40 MR images were evaluated independently by two observers and reevaluated by both observers 4 months later. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa statistic and intraclass correlation coefficient for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Inter-observer agreement for uterine volumes (kappa = 0.99, p < 0.0001), dominant fibroid volumes (kappa = 0.98, p <or= 0.0001), and number of fibroids (kappa = 0.88; CI, 0.77-0.93; p < 0.0001) was excellent. For the T(1)- and T(2)-weighted signal intensity of the dominant fibroid there was good agreement between the observers (87%; 95% CI, 71.9%-95.6%) and the intraobserver agreement was good for observer A (95%; 95% CI, 83.1%-99.4%) and moderate for observer B (kappa = 0.47). The interobserver agreement with respect to the presence of adenomyosis was good (kappa = 0.73, p < 0.0001), while both intraobserver agreements were fair to moderate (observer A, kappa = 0.55, p = 0.0003; and observer B, kappa = 0.66, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, MRI criteria used for the selection of suitable UAE patients show good inter- and intraobserver reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18057985     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-007-9209-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  4 in total

1.  MRI, US or real-time virtual sonography in the evaluation of adenomyosis?

Authors:  Valeria Vinci; Matteo Saldari; Maria Eleonora Sergi; Silvia Bernardo; Giuseppe Rizzo; Maria Grazia Porpora; Carlo Catalano; Lucia Manganaro
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound for determining fibroid burden: implications for research and clinical care.

Authors:  Eric D Levens; Robert Wesley; Ahalya Premkumar; Wendy Blocker; Lynnette K Nieman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Unbiased and efficient estimation of the volume of the fibroid uterus using the Cavalieri method and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michael J Thrippleton; Kirsty I Munro; Graham McKillop; David E Newby; Ian Marshall; Neil Roberts; Hilary O D Critchley
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 4.  Uterine fibroids: current perspectives.

Authors:  Aamir T Khan; Manjeet Shehmar; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.