Literature DB >> 18057411

Students' conceptions of underlying principles in medical physiology: an interview study of medical students' understanding in a PBL curriculum.

Anna Fyrenius1, Charlotte Silén, Staffan Wirell.   

Abstract

Medical physiology is known to be a complex area where students develop significant errors in conceptual understanding. Students' knowledge is often bound to situational descriptions rather than underlying principles. This study explores how medical students discern and process underlying principles in physiology. Indepth interviews, where students elaborated on principles related to blood pressure and blood pressure regulation, were carried out with 16 medical students in a problem-based learning curriculum. A qualitative, phenomenographic approach was used, and interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, qualitatively analyzed, and categorized. Four categories were outlined. The underlying principles were conceived as follows: 1) general conditions for body function at a specified time point, 2) transferable phenomena between organ systems and time points, 3) conditionally transferable phenomena between organ systems and time points, and 4) cognitive constructions of limited value in medical physiology. The results offers insights into students' thinking about underlying principles in physiology and suggest how understanding can be challenged to stimulate deep-level processing of underlying principles rather than situational descriptions of physiology. A complex conception of underlying principles includes an ability to problemize phenomena beyond long causal reasoning chains, which is often rewarded in traditional examinations and tests. Keywords for problemized processing are as follows: comparisons, differences, similarities, conditions, context, relevance, multiple sampling, connections, and dependencies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18057411     DOI: 10.1152/advan.00108.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  2 in total

1.  Uncovering students' misconceptions by assessment of their written questions.

Authors:  Marleen Olde Bekkink; A R T Rogier Donders; Jan G Kooloos; Rob M W de Waal; Dirk J Ruiter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  On the pedagogy of pharmacological communication: a study of final semester health science students.

Authors:  Ann Zetterqvist; Patrik Aronsson; Staffan Hägg; Karin Kjellgren; Margareta Reis; Gunnar Tobin; Shirley Booth
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.463

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.