BACKGROUND: Air pollution from road traffic is a serious health hazard, and people with preexisting respiratory disease may be at increased risk. We investigated the effects of short-term exposure to diesel traffic in people with asthma in an urban, roadside environment. METHODS: We recruited 60 adults with either mild or moderate asthma to participate in a randomized, crossover study. Each participant walked for 2 hours along a London street (Oxford Street) and, on a separate occasion, through a nearby park (Hyde Park). We performed detailed real-time exposure, physiological, and immunologic measurements. RESULTS: Participants had significantly higher exposures to fine particles (<2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter), ultrafine particles, elemental carbon, and nitrogen dioxide on Oxford Street than in Hyde Park. Walking for 2 hours on Oxford Street induced asymptomatic but consistent reductions in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (up to 6.1%) and forced vital capacity (FVC) (up to 5.4%) that were significantly larger than the reductions in FEV1 and FVC after exposure in Hyde Park (P=0.04 and P=0.01, respectively, for the overall effect of exposure, and P<0.005 at some time points). The effects were greater in subjects with moderate asthma than in those with mild asthma. These changes were accompanied by increases in biomarkers of neutrophilic inflammation (sputum myeloperoxidase, 4.24 ng per milliliter after exposure in Hyde Park vs. 24.5 ng per milliliter after exposure on Oxford Street; P=0.05) and airway acidification (maximum decrease in pH, 0.04% after exposure in Hyde Park and 1.9% after exposure on Oxford Street; P=0.003). The changes were associated most consistently with exposures to ultrafine particles and elemental carbon. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations serve as a demonstration and explanation of the epidemiologic evidence that associates the degree of traffic exposure with lung function in asthma. Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Air pollution from road traffic is a serious health hazard, and people with preexisting respiratory disease may be at increased risk. We investigated the effects of short-term exposure to diesel traffic in people with asthma in an urban, roadside environment. METHODS: We recruited 60 adults with either mild or moderate asthma to participate in a randomized, crossover study. Each participant walked for 2 hours along a London street (Oxford Street) and, on a separate occasion, through a nearby park (Hyde Park). We performed detailed real-time exposure, physiological, and immunologic measurements. RESULTS:Participants had significantly higher exposures to fine particles (<2.5 microm in aerodynamic diameter), ultrafine particles, elemental carbon, and nitrogen dioxide on Oxford Street than in Hyde Park. Walking for 2 hours on Oxford Street induced asymptomatic but consistent reductions in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (up to 6.1%) and forced vital capacity (FVC) (up to 5.4%) that were significantly larger than the reductions in FEV1 and FVC after exposure in Hyde Park (P=0.04 and P=0.01, respectively, for the overall effect of exposure, and P<0.005 at some time points). The effects were greater in subjects with moderate asthma than in those with mild asthma. These changes were accompanied by increases in biomarkers of neutrophilic inflammation (sputum myeloperoxidase, 4.24 ng per milliliter after exposure in Hyde Park vs. 24.5 ng per milliliter after exposure on Oxford Street; P=0.05) and airway acidification (maximum decrease in pH, 0.04% after exposure in Hyde Park and 1.9% after exposure on Oxford Street; P=0.003). The changes were associated most consistently with exposures to ultrafine particles and elemental carbon. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations serve as a demonstration and explanation of the epidemiologic evidence that associates the degree of traffic exposure with lung function in asthma. Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Authors: M J Gold; P R Hiebert; H Y Park; D Stefanowicz; A Le; M R Starkey; A Deane; A C Brown; G Liu; J C Horvat; Z A Ibrahim; M B Sukkar; P M Hansbro; C Carlsten; S VanEeden; D D Sin; K M McNagny; D A Knight; J A Hirota Journal: Mucosal Immunol Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 7.313
Authors: Nicholas C Newman; Patrick H Ryan; Bin Huang; Andrew F Beck; Hadley S Sauers; Robert S Kahn Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Cong Jin; Christopher P Shelburne; Guojie Li; Erin N Potts; Kristina J Riebe; Gregory D Sempowski; W Michael Foster; Soman N Abraham Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Daniela Urich; Saul Soberanes; Zach Burgess; Sergio E Chiarella; Andrew J Ghio; Karen M Ridge; David W Kamp; Navdeep S Chandel; Gökhan M Mutlu; G R Scott Budinger Journal: FASEB J Date: 2009-02-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Stephanie Lovinsky-Desir; Kyung Hwa Jung; Andrew G Rundle; Lori A Hoepner; Joshua B Bautista; Frederica P Perera; Steven N Chillrud; Matthew S Perzanowski; Rachel L Miller Journal: Environ Res Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Rachel L Miller; Robin Garfinkel; Cynthia Lendor; Lori Hoepner; Zheng Li; Lovisa Romanoff; Andreas Sjodin; Larry Needham; Frederica P Perera; Robin M Whyatt Journal: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Date: 2009-12-09 Impact factor: 6.377