Literature DB >> 18057286

Transarterial chemoembolization for primary hepatocellular carcinoma in patients at high risk.

Nishita Kothary1, Joshua L Weintraub, Jonathan Susman, John H Rundback.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has become a standard treatment option for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of TACE in patients at high risk with increased serum bilirubin level, low serum albumin level, poor hepatic reserve, or compromised hepatopetal flow in the portal vein (PV).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 52 patients underwent 65 high-risk procedures. Thirty patients treated with 38 procedures (57.7% of patients and 58.5% of procedures) had serum bilirubin levels of 2-3 mg/dL (ie, moderate elevation) and 22 patients treated with 27 procedures (42.3% and 41.5%) had a serum bilirubin level of at least 3 mg/dL (ie, considerable elevation). Forty patients (76.9%) had serum albumin levels less than 3.5 mg/dL. Thirteen recipients of 15 procedures (25% and 20%) had portal diversion or obstruction. Twenty-four patients (46.2%) had a Child-Pugh (CP) score of 8 or less and 28 patients (53.8%) had a CP score of at least 9 at the time of TACE. Thirty patients (57.7%) had focal tumors and 22 patients (42.3%) had multifocal or infiltrative disease. Superselective chemoembolization could be performed in 37 procedures (56.9%); lobar chemoembolization was performed in the remaining 28 (43.1%).
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 7.7% and the procedure-related morbidity rate was 10.8%. Patients with multifocal disease and lobar embolization had significantly higher mortality rates (P=.03). Individual factors such as serum bilirubin, serum albumin, and PV flow did not affect outcomes significantly. The 1- and 2-year survival rates in patients with focal disease were 67.9% and 37.7%, respectively, compared with 19.6% and 0% in patients with multifocal disease (P<.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: TACE in patients considered at high risk does not necessarily incur a higher incidence of morbidity or mortality. Patient selection should be based on extent of disease, and these tumors should be treated selectively at a segmental level if possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18057286     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  30 in total

1.  Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Thuong G Van Ha
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Use of the triaxial microcatheter method in super-selective transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  M Shimohira; H Ogino; T Kawai; A Kushita; M Watanabe; T Kawaguchi; K Kurono; Y Shibamoto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Mortality and morbidity of hepatectomy, radiofrequency ablation, and embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a national survey of 54,145 patients.

Authors:  Masaya Sato; Ryosuke Tateishi; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Haruhiko Yoshida; Shinya Matsuda; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 4.  Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal venous tumor thrombosis: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Kichang Han; Jin Hyoung Kim; Gi-Young Ko; Dong Il Gwon; Kyu-Bo Sung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Radiotherapy as valid modality for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis.

Authors:  Jeong Il Yu; Hee Chul Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  A Changing Paradigm for the Treatment of Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Consensus Statements.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Kwang-Hyub Han; Sheng-Long Ye; Jian Zhou; Yi-Hsiang Huang; Shi-Ming Lin; Chung-Kwe Wang; Masafumi Ikeda; Stephen Lam Chan; Su Pin Choo; Shiro Miyayama; Ann Lii Cheng
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 11.740

7.  Chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma with bile duct invasion: is preprocedural biliary drainage mandatory?

Authors:  Juil Park; Hyo-Cheol Kim; Jeong-Hoon Lee; EunJu Cho; Minuk Kim; Saebeom Hur; Hwan Jun Jae; Myungsu Lee; Jin Wook Chung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Portal vein thrombosis and arterioportal shunts: effects on tumor response after chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas J Vogl; Nour-Eldin Nour-Eldin; Sally Emad-Eldin; Nagy Nn Naguib; Joerg Trojan; Hans Ackermann; Omar Abdelaziz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Efficacy of TACE in TIPS patients: comparison of treatment response to chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with and without a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Authors:  Yuo-Chen Kuo; Maureen P Kohi; David M Naeger; Ricky T Tong; K Pallav Kolli; Andrew G Taylor; Jeanne M Laberge; Robert K Kerlan; Nicholas Fidelman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Clinical impact of selective transarterial chemoembolization on hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rodolfo Sacco; Marco Bertini; Pasquale Petruzzi; Michele Bertoni; Irene Bargellini; Giampaolo Bresci; Graziana Federici; Luigi Gambardella; Salvatore Metrangolo; Giuseppe Parisi; Antonio Romano; Antonio Scaramuzzino; Emanuele Tumino; Alessandro Silvestri; Emanuele Altomare; Claudio Vignali; Alfonso Capria
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.