Literature DB >> 18057211

How pleasant and unpleasant stimuli combine in different brain regions: odor mixtures.

Fabian Grabenhorst1, Edmund T Rolls, Christian Margot, Maria A A P da Silva, Maria Ines Velazco.   

Abstract

Many affective stimuli are hedonically complex mixtures containing both pleasant and unpleasant components. To investigate whether the brain represents the overall affective value of such complex stimuli, or the affective value of the different components simultaneously, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure brain activations to a pleasant odor (jasmine), an unpleasant odor (indole), and a mixture of the two that was pleasant. In brain regions that represented the pleasantness of the odors such as the medial orbitofrontal cortex (as shown by activations that correlated with the pleasantness ratings), the mixture produced activations of similar magnitude to the pleasant jasmine, but very different from the unpleasant indole. These regions thus emphasize the pleasant aspects of the mixture. In contrast, in regions representing the unpleasantness of odors such as the dorsal anterior cingulate and midorbitofrontal cortex the mixture produced activations that were relatively further from the pleasant component jasmine and closer to the indole. These regions thus emphasize the unpleasant aspects of the mixture. Thus mixtures that are found pleasant can have components that are separately pleasant and unpleasant, and the brain can separately and simultaneously represent the positive and negative hedonic value of a complex affective stimulus that contains both pleasant and unpleasant olfactory components. This type of representation may be important for affective decision making in the brain in that separate representations of different affective components of the same sensory stimulus may provide the inputs for making a decision about whether to choose the stimulus or not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18057211      PMCID: PMC6673088          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3337-07.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  38 in total

1.  Subconscious olfactory influences of stimulant and relaxant odors on immune function.

Authors:  Sokratis Trellakis; Cornelia Fischer; Alena Rydleuskaya; Sefik Tagay; Kirsten Bruderek; Jens Greve; Stephan Lang; Sven Brandau
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space.

Authors:  Catherine J Norris; Jackie Gollan; Gary G Berntson; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 3.  Function follows form: ecological constraints on odor codes and olfactory percepts.

Authors:  Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Representation of perceived sound valence in the human brain.

Authors:  Mikko Viinikainen; Jari Kätsyri; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Neonatal representation of odour objects: distinct memories of the whole and its parts.

Authors:  Gérard Coureaud; Thierry Thomas-Danguin; Donald A Wilson; Guillaume Ferreira
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Assessment of direct knowledge of the human olfactory system.

Authors:  Gregory Lane; Guangyu Zhou; Torben Noto; Christina Zelano
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  The effect of odor valence on olfactory performance in schizophrenia patients, unaffected relatives and at-risk youth.

Authors:  Vidyulata Kamath; Bruce I Turetsky; Monica E Calkins; Warren B Bilker; Nathan Frishberg; Karin Borgmann-Winter; Christian G Kohler; Catherine G Conroy; Raquel E Gur; Paul J Moberg
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.791

8.  Central Processing of the Chemical Senses: an Overview.

Authors:  Johan N Lundström; Sanne Boesveldt; Jessica Albrecht
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.418

9.  Receptor architecture of human cingulate cortex: evaluation of the four-region neurobiological model.

Authors:  Nicola Palomero-Gallagher; Brent A Vogt; Axel Schleicher; Helen S Mayberg; Karl Zilles
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Brain Activity in Self- and Value-Related Regions in Response to Online Antismoking Messages Predicts Behavior Change.

Authors:  Nicole Cooper; Steve Tompson; Matthew Brook O'Donnell; Emily B Falk
Journal:  J Media Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.