MOTIVATION: There often are many alternative models of a biochemical system. Distinguishing models and finding the most suitable ones is an important challenge in Systems Biology, as such model ranking, by experimental evidence, will help to judge the support of the working hypotheses forming each model. Bayes factors are employed as a measure of evidential preference for one model over another. Marginal likelihood is a key component of Bayes factors, however computing the marginal likelihood is a difficult problem, as it involves integration of nonlinear functions in multidimensional space. There are a number of methods available to compute the marginal likelihood approximately. A detailed investigation of such methods is required to find ones that perform appropriately for biochemical modelling. RESULTS: We assess four methods for estimation of the marginal likelihoods required for computing Bayes factors. The Prior Arithmetic Mean estimator, the Posterior Harmonic Mean estimator, the Annealed Importance Sampling and the Annealing-Melting Integration methods are investigated and compared on a typical case study in Systems Biology. This allows us to understand the stability of the analysis results and make reliable judgements in uncertain context. We investigate the variance of Bayes factor estimates, and highlight the stability of the Annealed Importance Sampling and the Annealing-Melting Integration methods for the purposes of comparing nonlinear models. AVAILABILITY: Models used in this study are available in SBML format as the supplementary material to this article.
MOTIVATION: There often are many alternative models of a biochemical system. Distinguishing models and finding the most suitable ones is an important challenge in Systems Biology, as such model ranking, by experimental evidence, will help to judge the support of the working hypotheses forming each model. Bayes factors are employed as a measure of evidential preference for one model over another. Marginal likelihood is a key component of Bayes factors, however computing the marginal likelihood is a difficult problem, as it involves integration of nonlinear functions in multidimensional space. There are a number of methods available to compute the marginal likelihood approximately. A detailed investigation of such methods is required to find ones that perform appropriately for biochemical modelling. RESULTS: We assess four methods for estimation of the marginal likelihoods required for computing Bayes factors. The Prior Arithmetic Mean estimator, the Posterior Harmonic Mean estimator, the Annealed Importance Sampling and the Annealing-Melting Integration methods are investigated and compared on a typical case study in Systems Biology. This allows us to understand the stability of the analysis results and make reliable judgements in uncertain context. We investigate the variance of Bayes factor estimates, and highlight the stability of the Annealed Importance Sampling and the Annealing-Melting Integration methods for the purposes of comparing nonlinear models. AVAILABILITY: Models used in this study are available in SBML format as the supplementary material to this article.
Authors: Heather A Harrington; Kenneth L Ho; Thomas Thorne; Michael P H Stumpf Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Will D Penny; Klaas E Stephan; Jean Daunizeau; Maria J Rosa; Karl J Friston; Thomas M Schofield; Alex P Leff Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2010-03-12 Impact factor: 4.475
Authors: William W Chen; Birgit Schoeberl; Paul J Jasper; Mario Niepel; Ulrik B Nielsen; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Peter K Sorger Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 11.429