Literature DB >> 18056983

AMPA receptors undergo channel arrest in the anoxic turtle cortex.

Matthew Edward Pamenter1, Damian Seung-Ho Shin, Leslie Thomas Buck.   

Abstract

Without oxygen, all mammals suffer neuronal injury and excitotoxic cell death mediated by overactivation of the glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR). The western painted turtle can survive anoxia for months, and downregulation of NMDAR activity is thought to be neuroprotective during anoxia. NMDAR activity is related to the activity of another glutamate receptor, the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptor (AMPAR). AMPAR blockade is neuroprotective against anoxic insult in mammals, but the role of AMPARs in the turtle's anoxia tolerance has not been investigated. To determine whether AMPAR activity changes during hypoxia or anoxia in the turtle cortex, whole cell AMPAR currents, AMPAR-mediated excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs), and excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were measured. The effect of AMPAR blockade on normoxic and anoxic NMDAR currents was also examined. During 60 min of normoxia, evoked peak AMPAR currents and the frequencies and amplitudes of EPSPs and EPSCs did not change. During anoxic perfusion, evoked AMPAR peak currents decreased 59.2 +/- 5.5 and 60.2 +/- 3.5% at 20 and 40 min, respectively. EPSP frequency (EPSP(f)) and amplitude decreased 28.7 +/- 6.4% and 13.2 +/- 1.7%, respectively, and EPSC(f) and amplitude decreased 50.7 +/- 5.1% and 51.3 +/- 4.7%, respectively. In contrast, hypoxic (Po(2) = 5%) AMPAR peak currents were potentiated 56.6 +/- 20.5 and 54.6 +/- 15.8% at 20 and 40 min, respectively. All changes were reversed by reoxygenation. AMPAR currents and EPSPs were abolished by 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX). In neurons pretreated with CNQX, anoxic NMDAR currents were reversibly depressed by 49.8 +/- 7.9%. These data suggest that AMPARs may undergo channel arrest in the anoxic turtle cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18056983     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00433.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  8 in total

1.  Painted turtle cortex is resistant to an in vitro mimic of the ischemic mammalian penumbra.

Authors:  Matthew Edward Pamenter; David William Hogg; Xiang Qun Gu; Leslie Thomas Buck; Gabriel George Haddad
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Alleviating brain stress: what alternative animal models have revealed about therapeutic targets for hypoxia and anoxia.

Authors:  Sarah L Milton; Ken Dawson-Scully
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2013

3.  Oxygen-sensitive interneurons exhibit increased activity and GABA release during ROS scavenging in the cerebral cortex of the western painted turtle.

Authors:  Peter John Hawrysh; Leslie Thomas Buck
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Endogenous GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor-mediated electrical suppression is critical to neuronal anoxia tolerance.

Authors:  Matthew E Pamenter; David W Hogg; Jake Ormond; Damian S Shin; Melanie A Woodin; Leslie T Buck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K+ channels regulate NMDAR activity in the cortex of the anoxic western painted turtle.

Authors:  Matthew Edward Pamenter; Damian Seung-Ho Shin; Mohan Cooray; Leslie Thomas Buck
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Aestivation and hypoxia-related events share common silent neuron trafficking processes.

Authors:  Giuseppina Giusi; Merylin Zizza; Rosa Maria Facciolo; Shit Fun Chew; Yuen Kwong Ip; Marcello Canonaco
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  Transcriptomic Responses of the Heart and Brain to Anoxia in the Western Painted Turtle.

Authors:  Sarah W Keenan; Craig A Hill; Cyriac Kandoth; Leslie T Buck; Daniel E Warren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Glutamatergic pathways in the brains of turtles: A comparative perspective among reptiles, birds, and mammals.

Authors:  Mohammad Tufazzal Hussan; Akiko Sakai; Hideaki Matsui
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.543

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.