Literature DB >> 18056618

A clinical trial gone awry: the Chocolate Happiness Undergoing More Pleasantness (CHUMP) study.

Kevin Chan.   

Abstract

The randomized controlled trial is the "gold standard" for evaluating the benefits and harms of interventions. The Chocolate Happiness Undergoing More Pleasantness (CHUMP) study was designed to compare the effects of dark chocolate, milk chocolate and normal chocolate consumption on happiness. Although the intention-to-treat analysis showed that participants who received either dark or milk chocolate were happier than those who received no additional chocolate, the actual-consumption analysis showed that there were no differences between any of the groups. The reason for this result is that many participants switched groups mid-study because of their personal chocolate preferences. Although the CHUMP study was pleasurable, it demonstrated the difficulties associated with performing a truly blinded clinical trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18056618      PMCID: PMC2096491          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.071161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  5 in total

1.  Discrepancy between published report and actual conduct of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Catherine L Hill; Michael P LaValley; David T Felson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Bias in clinical intervention research.

Authors:  Lise Lotte Gluud
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding.

Authors:  A Hróbjartsson; E Forfang; M T Haahr; B Als-Nielsen; S Brorson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Practical aspects of conducting a pragmatic randomised trial in primary care: patient recruitment and outcome assessment.

Authors:  D A van der Windt; B W Koes; M van Aarst; M A Heemskerk; L M Bouter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Methods of blinding in reports of randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacologic treatments: a systematic review.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutron; Candice Estellat; Lydia Guittet; Agnes Dechartres; David L Sackett; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.069

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.