OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the clinimetric properties of the AMC Linear Disability Score (ALDS), a new generic disability measure based on Item Response Theory, in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease (PD). METHODS: A sample of 132 patients with PD was evaluated using the Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y), the Unified PD Rating Scale motor examination, the Schwab and England scale (S&E), the Short Form-36, the PD Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the ALDS. RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability of the ALDS was good (alpha = 0.95) with 55 items extending the sufficient item-total correlation criterion (r > 0.20). The ALDS was correlated with other disability measures (r = 0.50 to 0.63) and decreasingly associated with measures reflecting impairments (r = 0.36 to 0.37) and mental health (r = 0.23 to -0.01). With regard to know-group validity, the ALDS indicated that patients with more severe PD (H&Y stage 3) were more disabled than patients with mild (H&Y stage 1) or moderate PD (H&Y stage 2) (p < 0.0001). The ALDS discriminated between more or less severe extrapyramidal symptoms (p = 0.001) and patients with postural instability showed lower ALDS scores compared to patients without postural instability (p = or< 0.0001). Compared to the S&E (score 100% = 19%), the ALDS showed less of a ceiling effect (5%). CONCLUSION: The AMC Linear Disability Score is a flexible, feasible, and clinimetrically promising instrument to assess the level of disability in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the clinimetric properties of the AMC Linear Disability Score (ALDS), a new generic disability measure based on Item Response Theory, in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease (PD). METHODS: A sample of 132 patients with PD was evaluated using the Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y), the Unified PD Rating Scale motor examination, the Schwab and England scale (S&E), the Short Form-36, the PD Quality of Life Questionnaire, and the ALDS. RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability of the ALDS was good (alpha = 0.95) with 55 items extending the sufficient item-total correlation criterion (r > 0.20). The ALDS was correlated with other disability measures (r = 0.50 to 0.63) and decreasingly associated with measures reflecting impairments (r = 0.36 to 0.37) and mental health (r = 0.23 to -0.01). With regard to know-group validity, the ALDS indicated that patients with more severe PD (H&Y stage 3) were more disabled than patients with mild (H&Y stage 1) or moderate PD (H&Y stage 2) (p < 0.0001). The ALDS discriminated between more or less severe extrapyramidal symptoms (p = 0.001) and patients with postural instability showed lower ALDS scores compared to patients without postural instability (p = or< 0.0001). Compared to the S&E (score 100% = 19%), the ALDS showed less of a ceiling effect (5%). CONCLUSION: The AMC Linear Disability Score is a flexible, feasible, and clinimetrically promising instrument to assess the level of disability in patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease.
Authors: Hans Wouters; Jos P C M Van Campen; Bregje A Appels; Jos H Beijnen; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Willem A Van Gool; Ben Schmand Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Franceline Alkine Frans; Suzanne E van Wijngaarden; Rosemarie Met; Mark J W Koelemay Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Camiel Verhamme; Rob J de Haan; Marinus Vermeulen; Frank Baas; Marianne de Visser; Ivo N van Schaik Journal: BMC Med Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Emily Rosenthal; Laura Brennan; Sharon Xie; Howard Hurtig; Joshua Milber; Daniel Weintraub; Jason Karlawish; Andrew Siderowf Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: José G M Hofhuis; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Aly Hovingh; Richard L Braam; Lisa van de Braak; Peter E Spronk; Johannes H Rommes Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Martijn A H Oude Voshaar; Peter M Ten Klooster; Harald E Vonkeman; Mart A F J van de Laar Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Rosemarie Met; Jim A Reekers; Mark J W Koelemay; Dink A Legemate; Rob J de Haan Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Constant V M Verschuur; S R Suwijn; B Post; M Dijkgraaf; B R Bloem; J J van Hilten; T van Laar; G Tissingh; G Deuschl; A E Lang; R J de Haan; R M A de Bie Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 2.474