OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinical assessment methods that grade the severity of impairments within the spectrum of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can predict clinical course, particularly among very mildly impaired individuals who do not meet formal MCI criteria as implemented in clinical trials. DESIGN: Cohort. SETTING: Community volunteers. PARTICIPANTS: From a longitudinal study of normal (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] = 0; n = 77) and mildly impaired (CDR = 0.5; n = 167) participants with 5 or more annual clinical assessments, baseline level of cognitive impairment in daily life was graded using CDR sum of boxes (CDR-SB) and level of cognitive performance impairment was graded using neuropsychological test scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Five-year outcome measures included (1) probable Alzheimer disease (AD) diagnosis and (2) clinical "decline" (CDR-SB increase > or = 1.0). Logistic regression models were used to assess the ability of baseline measures to predict outcomes in the full sample and separately in the subjects who did not meet formal MCI criteria as implemented in a multicenter clinical trial (n = 125; "very mild cognitive impairment" [vMCI]). RESULTS: The presence of both higher CDR-SB and lower verbal memory and executive function at baseline predicted greater likelihood of probable AD and decline. Five-year rates of probable AD and decline in vMCI (20%, AD; 49%, decline) were intermediate between normal participants (0%, AD; 28%, decline) and participants with MCI (41%, AD; 62%, decline). Within vMCI, likelihood of probable AD was predicted by higher CDR-SB and lower executive function. CONCLUSIONS: Even in very mildly impaired individuals who do not meet strict MCI criteria as implemented in clinical trials, the degree of cognitive impairment in daily life and performance on neuropsychological testing predict likelihood of an AD diagnosis within 5 years. The clinical determination of relative severity of impairment along the spectrum of MCI may be valuable for trials of putative disease-modifying compounds, particularly as target populations are broadened to include less impaired individuals.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinical assessment methods that grade the severity of impairments within the spectrum of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) can predict clinical course, particularly among very mildly impaired individuals who do not meet formal MCI criteria as implemented in clinical trials. DESIGN: Cohort. SETTING: Community volunteers. PARTICIPANTS: From a longitudinal study of normal (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] = 0; n = 77) and mildly impaired (CDR = 0.5; n = 167) participants with 5 or more annual clinical assessments, baseline level of cognitive impairment in daily life was graded using CDR sum of boxes (CDR-SB) and level of cognitive performance impairment was graded using neuropsychological test scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Five-year outcome measures included (1) probable Alzheimer disease (AD) diagnosis and (2) clinical "decline" (CDR-SB increase > or = 1.0). Logistic regression models were used to assess the ability of baseline measures to predict outcomes in the full sample and separately in the subjects who did not meet formal MCI criteria as implemented in a multicenter clinical trial (n = 125; "very mild cognitive impairment" [vMCI]). RESULTS: The presence of both higher CDR-SB and lower verbal memory and executive function at baseline predicted greater likelihood of probable AD and decline. Five-year rates of probable AD and decline in vMCI (20%, AD; 49%, decline) were intermediate between normal participants (0%, AD; 28%, decline) and participants with MCI (41%, AD; 62%, decline). Within vMCI, likelihood of probable AD was predicted by higher CDR-SB and lower executive function. CONCLUSIONS: Even in very mildly impaired individuals who do not meet strict MCI criteria as implemented in clinical trials, the degree of cognitive impairment in daily life and performance on neuropsychological testing predict likelihood of an AD diagnosis within 5 years. The clinical determination of relative severity of impairment along the spectrum of MCI may be valuable for trials of putative disease-modifying compounds, particularly as target populations are broadened to include less impaired individuals.
Authors: M C Tierney; J P Szalai; W G Snow; R H Fisher; A Nores; G Nadon; E Dunn; P H St George-Hyslop Journal: Neurology Date: 1996-03 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: D Sapolsky; A Bakkour; A Negreira; P Nalipinski; S Weintraub; M-M Mesulam; D Caplan; B C Dickerson Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ranjan Duara; David A Loewenstein; Maria T Greig; Elizabeth Potter; Warren Barker; Ashok Raj; John Schinka; Amy Borenstein; Michael Schoenberg; Yougui Wu; Jessica Banko; Huntington Potter Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Laura A Fraade-Blanar; Ryan N Hansen; Kwun Chuen G Chan; Jeanne M Sears; Hilaire J Thompson; Paul K Crane; Beth E Ebel Journal: Accid Anal Prev Date: 2018-03-07
Authors: Christiane Reitz; Adam M Brickman; Truman R Brown; Jennifer Manly; Charles DeCarli; Scott A Small; Richard Mayeux Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-11