Literature DB >> 18056098

Perceptions of patients' smiles: a comparison of patients' and dentists' opinions.

Jannike Jørnung1, Øystein Fardal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little information has been published regarding the difference between how patients perceive their own smiles and how dentists view them.
METHODOLOGY: The authors interviewed 78 consecutively seen patients in a general dental practice in Norway about esthetic features of their faces. The patients were not actively seeking esthetic treatment. Patients rated themselves using a 100-point visual analog scale (VAS), and then two dentists (the patients' regular dentist and an independent periodontist), working with photographs of the patients, used the same VAS in rating the patients' smiles.
RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 51.2 years (range, 22-84 years). There were 50 women (average age, 51.5 years; range, 22-84 years) and 28 men (average age, 52 years; range, 30-78 years). Patients' satisfaction with their own smiles reached an average of 59.1 (standard deviation [SD], 21.1; range, 5-100) on the VAS. The dentists' scores (38.6 and 40.7) were significantly lower than the patients' scores. The authors observed poor correlation between the periodontist's scores of dentogingival features and the patients' scores. Patients were most satisfied with the gingiva when smiling and least satisfied with tooth shade. Patients younger than 50 years were most satisfied with their smiles. Patients rated teeth and eyes as the most important features in an attractive face. Women gave teeth and hair significantly higher scores and head shape lower scores than did men.
CONCLUSION: Patients' opinions of their own smiles were significantly higher than the two clinicians' assessments of their smiles. Dentists should be aware that patients who seek esthetic services may have different perceptions of their smiles than may patients who do not express such desires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18056098     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  18 in total

1.  Do various degrees of tooth decalcification affect orthodontists', general dentists' and laypersons' ratings of smile esthetics?

Authors:  Iyad Al-Omari; Zaid Al-Bitar; Ahmad M Hamdan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Dental esthetics and its impact on psycho-social well-being and dental self confidence: a campus based survey of north Indian university students.

Authors:  Shaista Afroz; Shraddha Rathi; Geeta Rajput; Sajjad Abdur Rahman
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-01-05

Review 3.  The restorative management of tooth wear involving the aesthetic zone.

Authors:  S B Mehta; S Banerji
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 4.  Recommended clinical practice guidelines of aesthetic dentistry for Indians: An expert consensus.

Authors:  Dibyendu Majumder; Mithra N Hegde; Shishir Singh; Ashu Gupta; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; P Karunakar; R S Mohan Kumar; B Mrinalini; Shazeena Qaiser; Urvashi Bhimjibhai Sodvadia; Honap Manjiri Nagesh
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-05-04

5.  Balancing the risks and benefits associated with cosmetic dentistry - a joint statement by UK specialist dental societies.

Authors:  A Alani; M Kelleher; K Hemmings; M Saunders; M Hunter; S Barclay; M Ashley; S Djemal; K Bishop; U Darbar; P Briggs; J Fearne
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Comparative evaluation of esthetic perception of black spaces in patients with mandibular incisor extraction.

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Adrielle Mangabeira Santos; Felipe Santos Couto; Lívia Maria Andrade de Freitas; Raildo da Silva Coqueiro
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics.

Authors:  David C Havens; James A McNamara; Lauren M Sigler; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Perception of the esthetic impact of mandibular incisor extraction treatment on laypersons, dental professionals, and dental students.

Authors:  Matheus Melo Pithon; Adrielle Mangabeira Santos; Felipe Santos Couto; Raildo da Silva Coqueiro; Lívia Maria Andrade de Freitas; Ricardo Alves de Souza; Rogério Lacerda Dos Santos
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Perioral age-related changes in smile dynamics along the vertical plane: a videographic cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Bhavna Singh; Rajiv Ahluwalia; Deepa Verma; Stutee B Grewal; Rupender Goel; Priyanka S Kumar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects.

Authors:  Leandro Chambrone; Maria Aparecida Salinas Ortega; Flávia Sukekava; Roberto Rotundo; Zamira Kalemaj; Jacopo Buti; Giovan Paolo Pini Prato
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.