Literature DB >> 18055944

Acute effects of treatment for prodromal symptoms for people putatively in a late initial prodromal state of psychosis.

S Ruhrmann1, A Bechdolf, K-U Kühn, M Wagner, F Schultze-Lutter, B Janssen, K Maurer, H Häfner, W Gaebel, H-J Möller, W Maier, J Klosterkötter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People in a putatively late prodromal state not only have an enhanced risk for psychosis but already suffer from mental and functional disturbances. AIMS: To evaluate the acute effects of a combined supportive and antipsychotic treatment on prodromal symptoms.
METHOD: Putatively prodromal individuals were randomly assigned to a needs-focused intervention without (n=59) or with amisulpride (n=65). Outcome measures at 12-weeks effects were prodromal symptoms, global functioning and extrapyramidal side-effects.
RESULTS: Amisulpride plus the needs-focused intervention produced superior effects on attenuated and full-blown psychotic symptoms, basic, depressive and negative symptoms, and global functioning. Main side-effects were prolactin associated.
CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of amisulpride yielded a marked symptomatic benefit. Effects require confirmation by a placebo-controlled study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18055944     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.191.51.s88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl        ISSN: 0960-5371


  35 in total

Review 1.  Intervention in at-risk states for developing psychosis.

Authors:  Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Andreas Bechdolf; Joachim Klosterkötter
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  [Should antipsychotics be used in prodromal stages of schizophrenia to prevent psychosis? Pro].

Authors:  M Lambert; C Correll
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Lack of evidence to favor specific preventive interventions in psychosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cathy Davies; Andrea Cipriani; John P A Ioannidis; Joaquim Radua; Daniel Stahl; Umberto Provenzani; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 4.  Attrition rates in trials for adolescents and young adults at clinical high-risk for psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Megan S Farris; Daniel J Devoe; Jean Addington
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 2.732

5.  [Prevention of psychotic disorders].

Authors:  J Klosterkötter
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 6.  Antipsychotic interventions in prodromal psychosis: safety issues.

Authors:  Chen-Chung Liu; Arsime Demjaha
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Early intervention for psychosis.

Authors:  Max Marshall; John Rathbone
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-06-15

8.  Biofeedback to treat anxiety in young people at clinical high risk for developing psychosis.

Authors:  Laina McAusland; Jean Addington
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 2.732

Review 9.  Progress and Future Directions in Research on the Psychosis Prodrome: A Review for Clinicians.

Authors:  Kristen A Woodberry; Daniel I Shapiro; Caitlin Bryant; Larry J Seidman
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Update on the management of symptoms in schizophrenia: focus on amisulpride.

Authors:  Ann M Mortimer
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.