Literature DB >> 18055933

Economic evaluation of early intervention services.

Paul McCrone, Martin Knapp.   

Abstract

Early intervention services have been introduced in a number of countries, but the evidence base to support them is limited. In particular there are very few economic evaluations, which are crucial if decision-makers are to have a better understanding of how scarce resources can be used appropriately. This paper discusses the different approaches used in economic evaluations and shows how these differ in the way in which outcomes are measured. The most useful forms of evaluation are cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. We describe how the results of evaluations can be interpreted using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and acceptability curves. Finally, the paper summarises some key evidence to date on early intervention services and economic evaluations currently being undertaken.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18055933     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.191.51.s19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl        ISSN: 0960-5371


  6 in total

Review 1.  Alternatives to inpatient mental health care for children and young people.

Authors:  Sasha Shepperd; Helen Doll; Simon Gowers; Anthony James; Mina Fazel; Ray Fitzpatrick; Jon Pollock
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

2.  Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys.

Authors:  L H Andrade; J Alonso; Z Mneimneh; J E Wells; A Al-Hamzawi; G Borges; E Bromet; R Bruffaerts; G de Girolamo; R de Graaf; S Florescu; O Gureje; H R Hinkov; C Hu; Y Huang; I Hwang; R Jin; E G Karam; V Kovess-Masfety; D Levinson; H Matschinger; S O'Neill; J Posada-Villa; R Sagar; N A Sampson; C Sasu; D J Stein; T Takeshima; M C Viana; M Xavier; R C Kessler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 3.  Avoiding the 'twilight zone': recommendations for the transition of services from adolescence to adulthood for young people with ADHD.

Authors:  Susan Young; Clodagh M Murphy; David Coghill
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 4.  Psychosis Risk and Development: What Do We Know From Population-Based Studies?

Authors:  Eva Mennigen; Carrie E Bearden
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Comparison of high and low intensity contact between secondary and primary care to detect people at ultra-high risk for psychosis: study protocol for a theory-based, cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jesus Perez; Debra A Russo; Jan Stochl; Sarah Byford; Jorge Zimbron; Jonathan P Graffy; Michelle Painter; Tim J Croudace; Peter B Jones
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  First-episode psychosis: factors associated with delayed access to care in a rural Egyptian setting.

Authors:  Mamdouh El-Adl; Mohammed El-Mahdy; Musheera Anis
Journal:  Int Psychiatry       Date:  2008-10-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.