Literature DB >> 18054042

Two structures of a lambda Cro variant highlight dimer flexibility but disfavor major dimer distortions upon specific binding of cognate DNA.

Branwen M Hall1, Sue A Roberts, Annie Heroux, Matthew H J Cordes.   

Abstract

Previously reported crystal structures of free and DNA-bound dimers of lambda Cro differ strongly (about 4 A backbone rmsd), suggesting both flexibility of the dimer interface and induced-fit protein structure changes caused by sequence-specific DNA binding. Here, we present two crystal structures, in space groups P3(2)21 and C2 at 1.35 and 1.40 A resolution, respectively, of a variant of lambda Cro with three mutations in its recognition helix (Q27P/A29S/K32Q, or PSQ for short). One dimer structure (P3(2)21; PSQ form 1) resembles the DNA-bound wild-type Cro dimer (1.0 A backbone rmsd), while the other (C2; PSQ form 2) resembles neither unbound (3.6 A) nor bound (2.4 A) wild-type Cro. Both PSQ form 2 and unbound wild-type dimer crystals have a similar interdimer beta-sheet interaction between the beta1 strands at the edges of the dimer. In the former, an infinite, open beta-structure along one crystal axis results, while in the latter, a closed tetrameric barrel is formed. Neither the DNA-bound wild-type structure nor PSQ form 1 contains these interdimer interactions. We propose that beta-sheet superstructures resulting from crystal contact interactions distort Cro dimers from their preferred solution conformation, which actually resembles the DNA-bound structure. These results highlight the remarkable flexibility of lambda Cro but also suggest that sequence-specific DNA binding may not induce large changes in the protein structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18054042     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  9 in total

1.  Molecular simulation uncovers the conformational space of the λ Cro dimer in solution.

Authors:  Logan S Ahlstrom; Osamu Miyashita
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Packing interface energetics in different crystal forms of the λ Cro dimer.

Authors:  Logan S Ahlstrom; Osamu Miyashita
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-11-23

3.  Network visualization of conformational sampling during molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Logan S Ahlstrom; Joseph Lee Baker; Kent Ehrlich; Zachary T Campbell; Sunita Patel; Ivan I Vorontsov; Florence Tama; Osamu Miyashita
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.518

4.  Exposing the secrets of two well-known Lactobacillus casei phages, J-1 and PL-1, by genomic and structural analysis.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Dieterle; Charles Bowman; Carlos Batthyany; Esteban Lanzarotti; Adrián Turjanski; Graham Hatfull; Mariana Piuri
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  The protein interaction map of bacteriophage lambda.

Authors:  Seesandra V Rajagopala; Sherwood Casjens; Peter Uetz
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  The Molecular Switch of Telomere Phages: High Binding Specificity of the PY54 Cro Lytic Repressor to a Single Operator Site.

Authors:  Jens Andre Hammerl; Nicole Roschanski; Rudi Lurz; Reimar Johne; Erich Lanka; Stefan Hertwig
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  Loop interactions and dynamics tune the enzymatic activity of the human histone deacetylase 8.

Authors:  Micha B A Kunze; David W Wright; Nicolas D Werbeck; John Kirkpatrick; Peter V Coveney; D Flemming Hansen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Extreme divergence between one-to-one orthologs: the structure of N15 Cro bound to operator DNA and its relationship to the λ Cro complex.

Authors:  Branwen M Hall; Sue A Roberts; Matthew H J Cordes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Current View on EpCAM Structural Biology.

Authors:  Aljaž Gaber; Brigita Lenarčič; Miha Pavšič
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.