Literature DB >> 18053971

Subject's own name as a novel in a MMN design: a combined ERP and PET study.

Irena Holeckova1, Catherine Fischer, Dominique Morlet, Claude Delpuech, Nicolas Costes, François Mauguière.   

Abstract

With a view to elaborating a clinical tool to assess cognitive functions in brain-damaged patients, we had previously displayed characteristic patterns of ERPs (32 electrodes) in awake healthy persons in response to their own name (SON) presented as a novel in a passive oddball paradigm. In the present combined ERP and PET study, in an attempt to identify brain correlates of duration MMN and response to SON uttered by a familiar (FV) or an unknown voice (NFV), we used a block design protocol as close as possible to the aforementioned SON protocol. ERP data showed robust duration MMN and novelty P3 in response to SON similar to our previous results. The PET technique did not allow true MMN generators to be disclosed, but blocks with duration deviants elicited an increase of activation in the right temporal pole as compared with the control condition with no deviants, supporting the hypothesis of right hemispheric dominance in early sound discrimination. For SON contrasts, robust cerebral blood flow activation present over temporal, frontal and parietal cortices, in the hippocampus and in the precuneus could be associated with speech, novelty and self-recognition processing. Familiar and unfamiliar voices activated the prefrontal cortex differently, suggesting different retrieval processes, although corresponding ERP responses could not be differentiated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18053971     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  21 in total

1.  Resting brain activity varies with dream recall frequency between subjects.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub; Alain Nicolas; Jérôme Daltrozzo; Jérôme Redouté; Nicolas Costes; Perrine Ruby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Involvement of the dorsal and ventral attention networks in oddball stimulus processing: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Dissociation between anterior and posterior cortical regions during self-specificity and familiarity: a combined fMRI-meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Pengmin Qin; Yijun Liu; Jinfu Shi; Yuzhi Wang; Niall Duncan; Qiyong Gong; Xuchu Weng; Georg Northoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Social-emotional processing in nonverbal individuals with Angelman syndrome: evidence from brain responses to known and novel names.

Authors:  A P Key; D Jones
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2018-11-23

5.  Response to own name in children: ERP study of auditory social information processing.

Authors:  Alexandra P Key; Dorita Jones; Sarika U Peters
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  Cross-modal pattern of brain activations associated with the processing of self- and significant other's name.

Authors:  Pawel Tacikowski; André Brechmann; Anna Nowicka
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  MMN and novelty P3 in coma and other altered states of consciousness: a review.

Authors:  Dominique Morlet; Catherine Fischer
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  "Did you call me?" 5-month-old infants own name guides their attention.

Authors:  Eugenio Parise; Angela D Friederici; Tricia Striano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Further characterization of "subject's own name (SON) negativity," an ERP component reflecting early preattentive detection of SON.

Authors:  Toshihiko Tateuchi; Kosuke Itoh; Tsutomu Nakada
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-05-12

10.  Measuring affective reactivity in individuals with autism spectrum personality traits using the visual mismatch negativity event-related brain potential.

Authors:  Leigh C Gayle; Diana E Gal; Paul D Kieffaber
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.