Literature DB >> 18053676

Computer-based decision making in medicine: A model for surgery of colorectal liver metastases.

B S Langenhoff1, P F M Krabbe, T J M Ruers.   

Abstract

AIMS: Seeking the best available treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastases may be complex due to the interpretation of many variables. In this study conjoint analysis is used to develop a decision model to help clinicians selecting patients eligible for surgery of liver metastases.
METHODS: Patient and tumor characteristics decisive for surgery of colorectal liver metastases were selected from literature. A factorial design was used to construct virtual patient cases by balanced combinations of these characteristics. Surgeons experienced in liver surgery (n=25) were asked to give their advised treatment (resection and/or local ablation, or chemotherapy). Different tumor and patient variables were weighted in the analysis for their contribution to treatment choices.
RESULTS: Patient's age, the involvement of lobes and location of metastases in relation to large vessels were most important for treatment decisions. The number of metastases, size of the lesions, presence of resectable extrahepatic disease and time interval from primary tumor to metastases proved of less importance. Based on the analysis a computer-based decision model was designed.
CONCLUSION: Conjoint analysis can be a valuable tool in clinical decision making. The computer-based decision model can assist clinicians in defining which patient should be referred for liver surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18053676     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  7 in total

1.  Treating patients with colon cancer liver metastasis: a nationwide analysis of therapeutic decision making.

Authors:  Hari Nathan; John F Bridges; David P Cosgrove; Luis A Diaz; Daniel A Laheru; Joseph M Herman; Richard D Schulick; Barish H Edil; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael A Choti; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Multidisciplinary team meeting in digestive oncology: when opinions differ.

Authors:  Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian; Renato Costi; Audrey Bruderer; Christian Herve; Claude Smadja
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Understanding surgical decision making in early hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hari Nathan; John F P Bridges; Richard D Schulick; Andrew M Cameron; Kenzo Hirose; Barish H Edil; Christopher L Wolfgang; Dorry L Segev; Michael A Choti; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Identifying and prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Gisselle Gallego; Masatoshi Kudo; Kiwamu Okita; Kwang-Hyub Han; Sheng-Long Ye; Barri M Blauvelt
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Metachronous metastases from colorectal cancer: a population-based study in North-East Netherlands.

Authors:  Marloes A G Elferink; Koert P de Jong; Joost M Klaase; Esther J Siemerink; Johannes H W de Wilt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  L Hol; E W de Bekker-Grob; L van Dam; B Donkers; E J Kuipers; J D F Habbema; E W Steyerberg; M E van Leerdam; M L Essink-Bot
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Preference elicitation tool for abnormal uterine bleeding treatment: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lisa M Hess; Abigail Litwiller; John Byron; John Stutsman; Kelly Kasper; Lee A Learman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.883

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.