Literature DB >> 18053458

Safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy with direct bronchoscopic guidance for solid organ allograft recipients.

E Andrew Waller1, Javier F Aduen, David J Kramer, Francisco Alvarez, Michael G Heckman, Julia E Crook, Octavio E Pajaro, Lawrence R McBride, Cesar A Keller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) for solid organ allograft recipients, who have increased risks of bleeding and infection. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients who underwent solid organ transplant between January 1, 2001, and September 30, 2005, followed by PDT (using the Ciaglia technique) with direct bronchoscopic guidance. We recorded comorbid conditions, number of days from intubation and transplant, positive end-expiratory pressures, ratios of PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen, coagulation study findings, complications, and procedure-related mortality rates.
RESULTS: Of the 51 patients in our study, 17 had undergone lung transplant; 32, liver transplant; and 2, kidney transplant. The median age was 55 years (range, 27-73), and 53% of patients were men. The median time from intubation to PDT was 10 days and from transplant to PDT, 22 days. The median ratio of PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen was 293, and the median positive end-expiratory pressure was 5 cm H2O. Twenty-one patients were receiving dialysis, and 11 were recovering from sepsis (of these, 8 were receiving vasopressors). Ten had coagulopathies (none of which were associated with bleeding complications). Complications were infrequent (7 periprocedural, 4 postprocedural) and included bleeding, bradycardia, hypotension, tracheal ring fracture, and cannula malfunction. Of the bleeding complications, only 2 were clinically remarkable and required removal of the tracheostomy or surgical revision. No infectious complications or procedure-related deaths were noted.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy was tolerated well in recipients of solid organ allografts and had a relatively low risk of major complications and a low procedure-related mortality rate. This method should be considered an acceptable alternative to surgical tracheostomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18053458     DOI: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)61094-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  3 in total

1.  Early tracheostomy decreases ventilation time but has no impact on mortality of intensive care patients: a randomized study.

Authors:  Tillo Koch; Birgit Hecker; Andreas Hecker; Florian Brenck; Matthias Preuß; Thorsten Schmelzer; Winfried Padberg; Markus A Weigand; Joachim Klasen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  MECHANICAL VENTILATION FOR THE LUNG TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT.

Authors:  Lindsey Barnes; Robert M Reed; Kalpaj R Parekh; Jay K Bhama; Tahuanty Pena; Srinivasan Rajagopal; Gregory A Schmidt; Julia A Klesney-Tait; Michael Eberlein
Journal:  Curr Pulmonol Rep       Date:  2015-04-26

3.  Tracheostomy Post Liver Transplant: Predictors, Complications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan C Graham; Weston J Bush; Jeffrey S Mella; Jonathan A Fridell; Burcin Ekser; Plamen Mihaylov; Chandrashekhar A Kubal; Richard S Mangus
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 1.530

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.