Literature DB >> 18053318

Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients with atherothrombosis: CAPRIE-based calculation of cost-effectiveness for Germany.

K Berger1, F Hessel, J Kreuzer, A Smala, H C Diener.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To model the 2-year cost-effectiveness of secondary prevention with clopidogrel versus aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) (ASS) in German patients with myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic stroke (IS) or diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), based on CAPRIE trial data and from the perspective of German third party payers (TPP).
METHODS: An existing Markov model was adapted to Germany by using German cost data. The model was extended by using different datasets for cardiovascular event survival times (Framingham vs. Saskatchewan health databases) and in two separate scenarios.
RESULTS: The treatment with clopidogrel leads to a reduction of 13.19 vascular events per 1000 patients, of which 2.21 are vascular deaths. The overall incremental costs for the 2-year management of atherothrombotic patients with clopidogrel instead of ASS are calculated to be about euro1 241 440 per 1000 patients. The number of life-years saved (LYS) has been calculated as the difference in the number of life-years lost due to vascular death or events with ASS versus clopidogrel: it is 86.35 LYS when analysis is based on Framingham data and 66.07 LYS with Saskatchewan-based survival data. The incremental costs per LYS are euro14 380 and euro18 790, respectively. Cost-effectiveness is sensitive to changes in survival data, discounting and daily costs of clopidogrel, but stable against substantial (+/- 25%) changes in all other cost data.
CONCLUSION: The findings for Germany are in line with published results for Belgium (euro13 390 per LYS) and also with results for Italy (euro17 500 per LYS), both based on Saskatchewan data, and with a French analysis based on Framingham data (euro15 907 per LYS). Even if no officially accepted cost-effectiveness threshold exists for Germany at present, incremental cost-effectiveness results of less than euro20 000 per LYS for the treatment with clopidogrel can be assumed to be acceptable for German third party payers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18053318     DOI: 10.1185/030079908x253762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  7 in total

Review 1.  Anticoagulation in neurointerventions: basic pharmacology and pathophysiology, current status, practical advice.

Authors:  J Scharf; C-E Dempfle
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Revaluation of clopidogrel: let the data speak for themselves.

Authors:  Li Liu; Fandian Zeng; Xiaohua Zeng; Qingmei Xue; Shaoping Nie; Cailian Kang; Jianhong Wu; Qingyun Kang; Xingao Wang; Xiaoqing Liu; Tao Li; Jun Chen; Qing Li; Rong Xu; Xiaoyan Yang; Hui Kang; Fagang Jiang; Zongtao Li; Xuwu Wang; Li Zhang; Yu Long
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-17

3.  Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients with recent ischemic stroke and established peripheral artery disease: an economic evaluation in a Chinese setting.

Authors:  Te Li; Maobai Liu; He Ben; Zhenxing Xu; Han Zhong; Bin Wu
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Cost of clinical events in health economic evaluations in Germany: a systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Scheuringer; Narine Sahakyan; Karl J Krobot; Volker Ulrich
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2012-05-31

5.  Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel Monotherapy for the Treatment of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jun Yuan; Guang Ma Xu; Jiawang Ding
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with acute coronary syndrome in Germany.

Authors:  Ulrike Theidel; Christian Asseburg; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo Katus
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Comparison Between Aspirin and Clopidogrel in Secondary Stroke Prevention Based on Real-World Data.

Authors:  Nai-Fang Chi; Chi-Pang Wen; Chung-Hsiang Liu; Jie-Yuan Li; Jiann-Shing Jeng; Chih-Hung Chen; Li-Ming Lien; Ching-Huang Lin; Yu Sun; Wei-Lun Chang; Chaur-Jong Hu; Chung Y Hsu
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.