BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the asthma burden in the general population. We evaluated the level and the factors associated with the asthma burden in Europe. METHODS: In 1999-2002, 1152 adult asthmatics were identified in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS)-II and the socio-economic burden (reduced activity days and hospital services utilization in the past 12 months) was assessed. RESULTS: The asthmatics with a light burden (only a few reduced activity days) were 13.2% (95% CI: 11.4-15.3%), whereas those with a heavy burden (many reduced activity days and/or hospital services utilization) were 14.0% (95% CI: 12.1-16.1%). The burden was strongly associated with disease severity and a lower quality of life. Obese asthmatics had a significantly increased risk of a light [relative risk ratio (RRR) = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.18-4.00] or a heavy burden (RRR = 2.77; 95% CI: 1.52-5.05) compared with normal/underweight subjects. The asthmatics with frequent respiratory symptoms showed a threefold (RRR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.63-4.61) and sixfold (RRR = 5.76; 95% CI: 3.25-10.20) increased risk of a light or a heavy burden compared with asymptomatic asthmatics, respectively. Moreover, the lower the forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted, the higher the risk of a heavy burden. The coexistence with chronic cough/phlegm only increased the risk of a heavy burden (RRR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.16-3.06). An interaction was found between gender and IgE sensitization, with nonatopic asthmatic females showing the highest risk of a heavy burden (21.6%; 95% CI: 16.9-27.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The asthma burden is substantial in Europe. A heavy burden is more common in asthmatics with obesity, frequent respiratory symptoms, low lung function, chronic cough/phlegm and in nonatopic females.
BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the asthma burden in the general population. We evaluated the level and the factors associated with the asthma burden in Europe. METHODS: In 1999-2002, 1152 adult asthmatics were identified in the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS)-II and the socio-economic burden (reduced activity days and hospital services utilization in the past 12 months) was assessed. RESULTS: The asthmatics with a light burden (only a few reduced activity days) were 13.2% (95% CI: 11.4-15.3%), whereas those with a heavy burden (many reduced activity days and/or hospital services utilization) were 14.0% (95% CI: 12.1-16.1%). The burden was strongly associated with disease severity and a lower quality of life. Obese asthmatics had a significantly increased risk of a light [relative risk ratio (RRR) = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.18-4.00] or a heavy burden (RRR = 2.77; 95% CI: 1.52-5.05) compared with normal/underweight subjects. The asthmatics with frequent respiratory symptoms showed a threefold (RRR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.63-4.61) and sixfold (RRR = 5.76; 95% CI: 3.25-10.20) increased risk of a light or a heavy burden compared with asymptomatic asthmatics, respectively. Moreover, the lower the forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted, the higher the risk of a heavy burden. The coexistence with chronic cough/phlegm only increased the risk of a heavy burden (RRR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.16-3.06). An interaction was found between gender and IgE sensitization, with nonatopic asthmatic females showing the highest risk of a heavy burden (21.6%; 95% CI: 16.9-27.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The asthma burden is substantial in Europe. A heavy burden is more common in asthmatics with obesity, frequent respiratory symptoms, low lung function, chronic cough/phlegm and in nonatopic females.
Authors: Carlos A Camargo; Kourtney J Davis; Elizabeth B Andrews; David A Stempel; Michael Schatz Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Eric D Bateman; Alfredo G Guerreros; Florian Brockhaus; Björn Holzhauer; Abhijit Pethe; Richard A Kay; Robert G Townley Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: K K Anastassakis; A Chatzimichail; I Androulakis; S Charisoulis; Maria Riga; Anna Eleftheriadou; V Danielides Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Simone Accordini; Angelo Guido Corsico; Lucia Calciano; Roberto Bono; Isa Cerveri; Alessandro Fois; Pietro Pirina; Roberta Tassinari; Giuseppe Verlato; Roberto de Marco Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Giorgio Walter Canonica; Giorgio Lorenzo Colombo; Paola Rogliani; Pierachille Santus; Claudia Pitotti; Sergio Di Matteo; Chiara Martinotti; Giacomo Matteo Bruno Journal: Risk Manag Healthc Policy Date: 2020-01-22
Authors: Moises A Calderon; Pascal Demoly; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Jean Bousquet; Aziz Sheikh; Anthony Frew; Glenis Scadding; Claus Bachert; Hans J Malling; Rudolph Valenta; Beatrice Bilo; Antonio Nieto; Cezmi Akdis; Jocelyne Just; Carmen Vidal; Eva M Varga; Emilio Alvarez-Cuesta; Barbara Bohle; Albrecht Bufe; Walter G Canonica; Victoria Cardona; Ronald Dahl; Alain Didier; Stephen R Durham; Peter Eng; Montserrat Fernandez-Rivas; Lars Jacobsen; Marek Jutel; Jörg Kleine-Tebbe; Ludger Klimek; Jan Lötvall; Carmen Moreno; Ralph Mosges; Antonella Muraro; Bodo Niggemann; Giovanni Pajno; Giovanni Passalacqua; Oliver Pfaar; Sabina Rak; Gianenrico Senna; Gabriela Senti; Erkka Valovirta; Marianne van Hage; Johannes C Virchow; Ulrich Wahn; Nikolaos Papadopoulos Journal: Clin Transl Allergy Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 5.871
Authors: Simone Accordini; Angelo Guido Corsico; Isa Cerveri; Leonardo Antonicelli; Francesco Attena; Roberto Bono; Lucio Casali; Marcello Ferrari; Alessandro Fois; Pierpaolo Marchetti; Pietro Pirina; Roberta Tassinari; Giuseppe Verlato; Roberto de Marco Journal: Respir Res Date: 2013-02-08