BACKGROUND: Estimates of intraindividual variation in hormone levels provide the basis for interpreting hormone measurements clinically and for developing eligibility criteria for trials of hormone replacement therapy. However, reliable systematic estimates of such variation are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To estimate intraindividual variation of serum total, free and bioavailable testosterone (T), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), SHBG, LH, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), oestrone, oestradiol and cortisol, and the contributions of biological and assay variation to the total. DESIGN: Paired blood samples were obtained 1-3 days apart at entry and again 3 months and 6 months later (maximum six samples per subject). Each sample consisted of a pool of equal aliquots of two blood draws 20 min apart. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Men aged 30-79 years were randomly selected from the respondents to the Boston Area Community Health Survey, a study of the health of the general population of Boston, MA, USA. Analysis was based on 132 men, including 121 who completed all six visits, 8 who completed the first two visits and 3 who completed the first four visits. MEASUREMENTS: Day-to-day and 3-month (long-term) intraindividual standard deviations, after transforming measurements to logarithms to eliminate the contribution of hormone level to intraindividual variation. RESULTS: Biological variation generally accounted for more of total intraindividual variation than did assay variation. Day-to-day biological variation accounted for more of the total than did long-term biological variation. Short-term variability was greater in hormones with pulsatile secretion (e.g. LH) than those that exhibit less ultradian variation. Depending on the hormone, the intraindividual standard deviations imply that a clinician can expect to see a difference exceeding 18-28% about half the time when two measurements are made on a subject. The difference will exceed 27-54% about a quarter of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Given the level of intraindividual variability in hormone levels found in this study, one sample is generally not sufficient to characterize an individual's hormone levels but collecting more than three is probably not warranted. This is true for clinical measurements and for hormone measurements used to determine eligibility for a clinical trial of hormone replacement therapy.
BACKGROUND: Estimates of intraindividual variation in hormone levels provide the basis for interpreting hormone measurements clinically and for developing eligibility criteria for trials of hormone replacement therapy. However, reliable systematic estimates of such variation are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To estimate intraindividual variation of serum total, free and bioavailable testosterone (T), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), SHBG, LH, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), oestrone, oestradiol and cortisol, and the contributions of biological and assay variation to the total. DESIGN: Paired blood samples were obtained 1-3 days apart at entry and again 3 months and 6 months later (maximum six samples per subject). Each sample consisted of a pool of equal aliquots of two blood draws 20 min apart. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Men aged 30-79 years were randomly selected from the respondents to the Boston Area Community Health Survey, a study of the health of the general population of Boston, MA, USA. Analysis was based on 132 men, including 121 who completed all six visits, 8 who completed the first two visits and 3 who completed the first four visits. MEASUREMENTS: Day-to-day and 3-month (long-term) intraindividual standard deviations, after transforming measurements to logarithms to eliminate the contribution of hormone level to intraindividual variation. RESULTS: Biological variation generally accounted for more of total intraindividual variation than did assay variation. Day-to-day biological variation accounted for more of the total than did long-term biological variation. Short-term variability was greater in hormones with pulsatile secretion (e.g. LH) than those that exhibit less ultradian variation. Depending on the hormone, the intraindividual standard deviations imply that a clinician can expect to see a difference exceeding 18-28% about half the time when two measurements are made on a subject. The difference will exceed 27-54% about a quarter of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Given the level of intraindividual variability in hormone levels found in this study, one sample is generally not sufficient to characterize an individual's hormone levels but collecting more than three is probably not warranted. This is true for clinical measurements and for hormone measurements used to determine eligibility for a clinical trial of hormone replacement therapy.
Authors: Manthos G Giannoulis; Finbarr C Martin; K Sreekumaran Nair; A Margot Umpleby; Peter Sonksen Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Jacques Baillargeon; Randall J Urban; Yong-Fang Kuo; Holly M Holmes; Mukaila A Raji; Abraham Morgentaler; Bret T Howrey; Yu-Li Lin; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Jane A Cauley; Laura Fluharty; Susan S Ellenberg; Thomas M Gill; Kristine E Ensrud; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Denise Cifelli; Glenn R Cunningham; Alvin M Matsumoto; Shalender Bhasin; Marco Pahor; John T Farrar; David Cella; Raymond C Rosen; Susan M Resnick; Ronald S Swerdloff; Cora E Lewis; Mark E Molitch; Jill P Crandall; Alisa J Stephens-Shields; Thomas W Strorer; Christina Wang; Stephen Anton; Shehzad Basaria; Susan Diem; Vafa Tabatabaie; Darlene Dougar; Xiaoling Hou; Peter J Snyder Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Thomas G Travison; Rebecca Shackelton; Andre B Araujo; Susan A Hall; Rachel E Williams; Richard V Clark; Amy B O'Donnell; John B McKinlay Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andrew J Weickhardt; Robert C Doebele; W Thomas Purcell; Paul A Bunn; Ana B Oton; Micol S Rothman; Margaret E Wierman; Tony Mok; Sanjay Popat; Julie Bauman; Jorge Nieva; Silvia Novello; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; D Ross Camidge Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: D P Patel; W O Brant; J B Myers; A P Presson; E B Johnstone; J A Dorais; K I Aston; D T Carrell; J M Hotaling Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 2.896