Literature DB >> 18052779

Binding 3-D object perception in the human visual cortex.

Yang Jiang1, C N Boehler, Nina Nönnig, Emrah Düzel, Jens-Max Hopf, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld.   

Abstract

How do visual luminance, shape, motion, and depth bind together in the brain to represent the coherent percept of a 3-D object within hundreds of milliseconds (msec)? We provide evidence from simultaneous magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) data that perception of 3-D objects defined by luminance or motion elicits sequential activity in human visual cortices within 500 msec. Following activation of the primary visual cortex around 100 msec, 3-D objects elicited sequential activity with only little overlap (dynamic 3-D shapes: MT-LO-Temp; stationary 3-D shapes: LO-Temp). A delay of 80 msec, both in MEG/EEG responses and in reaction times (RTs), was found when additional motion information was processed. We also found significant positive correlations between RT, and MEG and EEG responses in the right temporal location. After about 400 msec, long-lasting activity was observed in the parietal cortex and concurrently in previously activated regions. Novel time-frequency analyses indicate that the activity in the lateral occipital (LO) complex is associated with an increase of induced power in the gamma band, a hallmark of binding. The close correspondence of an induced gamma response with concurrent sources located in the LO in both experimental conditions at different points in time ( approximately 200 msec for luminance and approximately 300 msec for dynamic cues) strongly suggests that the LO is the key region for the assembly of object features. The assembly is fed forward to achieve coherent perception of a 3-D object within 500 msec.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18052779      PMCID: PMC3658156          DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  45 in total

1.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  A multivariate, spatiotemporal analysis of electromagnetic time-frequency data of recognition memory.

Authors:  E Düzel; R Habib; B Schott; A Schoenfeld; N Lobaugh; A R McIntosh; M Scholz; H J Heinze
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex.

Authors:  Zoe Kourtzi; Michael Erb; Wolfgang Grodd; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Sensory systems. Editorial overview.

Authors:  W Singer; R R Reed
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex.

Authors:  R Malach; J B Reppas; R R Benson; K K Kwong; H Jiang; W A Kennedy; P J Ledden; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human.

Authors:  C Tallon-Baudry; O Bertrand; C Delpuech; J Pernier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess adaptation and size invariance of shape processing by humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Hiromasa Sawamura; Svetlana Georgieva; Rufin Vogels; Wim Vanduffel; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Visual inertia of rotating 3-D objects.

Authors:  Y Jiang; A J Pantle; L S Mark
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-02

Review 10.  Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Guy A Orban; David Van Essen; Wim Vanduffel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  6 in total

1.  Brain responses to repeated visual experience among low and high sensation seekers: role of boredom susceptibility.

Authors:  Yang Jiang; Joann Lianekhammy; Adam Lawson; Chunyan Guo; Donald Lynam; Jane E Joseph; Brian T Gold; Thomas H Kelly
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  Cortical activation associated with determination of depth order during transparent motion perception: A normalized integrative fMRI-MEG study.

Authors:  Hiroaki Natsukawa; Tetsuo Kobayashi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Neural correlates of age-related reduction in visual motion priming.

Authors:  Yang Jiang; Yue-Jia Luo; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-03

4.  What you see depends on what you saw, and what else you saw: the interactions between motion priming and object priming.

Authors:  Xiong Jiang; Yang Jiang; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  How simultaneous is the perception of binocular depth and rivalry in plaid stimuli?

Authors:  Athena Buckthought; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-05-09

6.  Stimulus dependency of object-evoked responses in human visual cortex: an inverse problem for category specificity.

Authors:  Britta Graewe; Peter De Weerd; Reza Farivar; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.