Literature DB >> 18052015

Nonspecific low back pain and return to work.

Trang H Nguyen1, David C Randolph.   

Abstract

As many as 90 percent of persons with occupational nonspecific low back pain are able to return to work in a relatively short period of time. As long as no "red flags" exist, the patient should be encouraged to remain as active as possible, minimize bed rest, use ice or heat compresses, take anti-inflammatory or analgesic medications if desired, participate in home exercises, and return to work as soon as possible. Medical and surgical intervention should be minimized when abnormalities on physical examination are lacking and the patient is having difficulty returning to work after four to six weeks. Personal and occupational psychosocial factors should be addressed thoroughly, and a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program should be strongly considered to prevent delayed recovery and chronic disability. Patient advocacy should include preventing unnecessary and ineffective medical and surgical interventions, prolonged work loss, joblessness, and chronic disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18052015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Fam Physician        ISSN: 0002-838X            Impact factor:   3.292


  16 in total

1.  What happens to work if you're unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting.

Authors:  Gwenllian Wynne-Jones; Rhiannon Buck; Carol Porteous; Lucy Cooper; Lori A Button; Chris J Main; Ceri J Phillips
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

2.  Chiropractic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kent Stuber; Sandy Sajko; Kevyn Kristmanson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2009-06

3.  Non-specific low back pain: occupational or lifestyle consequences?

Authors:  Jadranka Stričević; Breda Jesenšek Papež
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Buddies in bad times? the role of co-workers after a work-related injury.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kosny; Marni Lifshen; Diana Pugliese; Gary Majesky; Desre Kramer; Ivan Steenstra; Sophie Soklaridis; Christine Carrasco
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

5.  What lies beyond the pain? A case report.

Authors:  Mohd Hashim Syahnaz; Muhammad Noor Azimah; Omar Khairani
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2010-12

6.  The low level laser therapy (LLLT) operating in 660 nm reduce gene expression of inflammatory mediators in the experimental model of collagenase-induced rat tendinitis.

Authors:  Romildo Torres-Silva; Rodrigo Alvaro Brandão Lopes-Martins; Jan Magnus Bjordal; Lucio Frigo; Rachid Rahouadj; Gilles Arnold; Ernesto Cesar Pinto Leal-Junior; Jacques Magdalou; Rodney Pallotta; Rodrigo Labat Marcos
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Changes in lumbar disk morphology associated with prolonged sitting assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gregory G Billy; Susan K Lemieux; Mosuk X Chow
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Structural Brain Imaging in People With Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Zaid M Mansour; Rebecca J Lepping; Robyn A Honea; William M Brooks; Hung-Wen Yeh; Jeffrey M Burns; Neena K Sharma
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Contributions of prognostic factors for poor outcome in primary care low back pain patients.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn; Kelvin P Jordan; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.931

10.  A qualitative study on the role of cultural background in patients' perspectives on rehabilitation.

Authors:  Mandy Scheermesser; Stefan Bachmann; Astrid Schämann; Peter Oesch; Jan Kool
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.