Literature DB >> 18051005

Survival of inlays and partial crowns made of IPS empress after a 10-year observation period and in relation to various treatment parameters.

Richard Stoll1, I Cappel, Anahita Jablonski-Momeni, K Pieper, V Stachniss.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study evaluated the long-term survival of inlays and partial crowns made of IPS Empress. For this purpose, the patient data of a prospective study were examined in retrospect and statistically evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All of the inlays and partial crowns fabricated of IPS-Empress within the Department of Operative Dentistry at the School of Dental Medicine of Philipps University, Marburg, Germany were systematically recorded in a database between 1991 and 2001. The corresponding patient files were revised at the end of 2001. The information gathered in this way was used to evaluate the survival of the restorations using the method described by Kaplan and Meyer.
RESULTS: A total of n = 1624 restorations were fabricated of IPS-Empress within the observation period. During this time, n = 53 failures were recorded. The remaining restorations were observed for a mean period of 18.77 months. The failures were mainly attributed to fractures, endodontic problems and cementation errors. The last failure was established after 82 months. At this stage, a cumulative survival probability of p = 0.81 was registered with a standard error of 0.04. At this time, n = 30 restorations were still being observed. Restorations on vital teeth (n = 1588) showed 46 failures, with a cumulative survival probability of p = 0.82. Restorations performed on non-vital teeth (n = 36) showed seven failures, with a cumulative survival probability of p = 0.53. Highly significant differences were found between the two groups (p < 0.0001) in a log-rank test. No significant difference (p = 0.41) was found between the patients treated by students (n = 909) and those treated by qualified dentists (n = 715). Likewise, no difference (p = 0.13) was established between the restorations seated with a high viscosity cement (n = 295) and those placed with a low viscosity cement (n = 1329).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18051005     DOI: 10.2341/07-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  7 in total

1.  Bond strength of composite resin to glass ceramic after saliva contamination.

Authors:  Frank Nikolaus; Martin Wolkewitz; Petra Hahn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: 12-year follow-up.

Authors:  Maria Jacinta Moraes Coelho Santos; Maria Cristina Freitas; Larissa Marinho Azevedo; Gildo Coelho Santos; Maria Fidela Navarro; Carlos Eduardo Francischone; Rafael Francisco Mondelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Clinical outcome of bonded partial indirect posterior restorations on vital and non-vital teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mario Dioguardi; Mario Alovisi; Giuseppe Troiano; Carlo Vito Alberto Caponio; Andrea Baldi; Giovanni Tommaso Rocca; Allegra Comba; Lorenzo Lo Muzio; Nicola Scotti
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Clinical Behavior of Ceramic, Hybrid and Composite Onlays. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Naia Bustamante-Hernández; Jose María Montiel-Company; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José Félix Mañes-Ferrer; María Fernanda Solá-Ruíz; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Lucía Fernández-Estevan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review.

Authors:  Christa D Hopp; Martin F Land
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2013-04-18

Review 6.  Cementation of Glass-Ceramic Posterior Restorations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carline R G van den Breemer; Marco M M Gresnigt; Marco S Cune
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations.

Authors:  Devangkumar Rajnikant Patel; Tim O'Brien; Aviva Petrie; Haralampos Petridis
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.