OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if a fast-track recovery protocol that is applied in other countries can be used in the present Japanese medical system. Second, we wanted to evaluate the differences if the protocol was adapted from the viewpoint of cost saving, postoperative hospital stay, and adverse complications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 94 consecutive patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery with conventional techniques on cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary bypass between July 1, 2004 and June 30, 2006. We started our fast-track recovery protocol from July 1, 2005. We compared the results of the conventional group (before July 1, 2005) and the fast-track recovery protocol group (after July 1, 2005). Moreover, we used a unique questionnaire and investigated how the patients in the fast-track group felt about the short hospital stay postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean postoperative hospital stay was 36.7 +/- 6.0 days for the conventional group and 15.0 +/- 12.4 days for the fast-track group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.01). The mean cost fell by almost half, from 712545 yen to 383268 yen (P = 0.038). The difference in complication rates was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A fast-track recovery protocol can be safely adapted to patients in the Japanese system without increasing the mortality or morbidity rate. Based on our unique questionnaires, the most important factor was sufficient and repeated explanations preoperatively to the patients and their family members. Second, good pain control with routine use of acetaminophen and sporadic morphine orally has a great effect on the patients' recovery.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if a fast-track recovery protocol that is applied in other countries can be used in the present Japanese medical system. Second, we wanted to evaluate the differences if the protocol was adapted from the viewpoint of cost saving, postoperative hospital stay, and adverse complications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 94 consecutive patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery with conventional techniques on cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary bypass between July 1, 2004 and June 30, 2006. We started our fast-track recovery protocol from July 1, 2005. We compared the results of the conventional group (before July 1, 2005) and the fast-track recovery protocol group (after July 1, 2005). Moreover, we used a unique questionnaire and investigated how the patients in the fast-track group felt about the short hospital stay postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean postoperative hospital stay was 36.7 +/- 6.0 days for the conventional group and 15.0 +/- 12.4 days for the fast-track group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.01). The mean cost fell by almost half, from 712545 yen to 383268 yen (P = 0.038). The difference in complication rates was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A fast-track recovery protocol can be safely adapted to patients in the Japanese system without increasing the mortality or morbidity rate. Based on our unique questionnaires, the most important factor was sufficient and repeated explanations preoperatively to the patients and their family members. Second, good pain control with routine use of acetaminophen and sporadic morphine orally has a great effect on the patients' recovery.
Authors: Alexander Kogan; Jonathan Cohen; Ehud Raanani; Gideon Sahar; Boris Orlov; Pierre Singer; Bernardo A Vidne Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: M J London; A L Shroyer; V Jernigan; D A Fullerton; D Wilcox; J Baltz; J M Brown; S MaWhinney; K E Hammermeister; F L Grover Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: D C Cheng; J Karski; C Peniston; B Asokumar; G Raveendran; J Carroll; H Nierenberg; S Roger; D Mickle; J Tong; J Zelovitsky; T David; A Sandler Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Davy C H Cheng; Claus Wall; George Djaiani; Raul A Peragallo; Jo Carroll; Cindy Li; David Naylor Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Fiona Paton; Duncan Chambers; Paul Wilson; Alison Eastwood; Dawn Craig; Dave Fox; David Jayne; Erika McGinnes Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 2.692