RATIONALE: As exogenous cannabinoid agonists impair memory formation, could it be that antagonists have opposing effects and act as memory-enhancing drugs? OBJECTIVES: Here, we studied the effects of the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A (SR; Rimonabant) on spatial learning and memory formation and assessed the possible involvement of hippocampal CB(1) receptor in these actions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the water maze, spatial reference memory was probed using different training protocols followed by assessment of behavioral flexibility. The CB(1) receptor antagonist SR (3 mg/kg) was intraperitoneally administered before or immediately after training in experiment 1, or via minipumps intrahippocampally (0.89 ng and 0.089 ng/day) either during or after spatial learning, or subcutaneously in experiment 2. RESULTS: In experiment 1, systemic SR impaired spatial learning when given intraperitoneally (ip) before training coincident with increasing swim speed and thigmotaxis. Pretraining before drug treatment eliminated these effects while post-training injections had no effect. In experiment 2, intrahippocampal infusion of 0.089 ng SR during training enhanced acquisition learning, but did not affect long-term consolidation of spatial memory. In contrast, subcutaneous infusion of SR via minipumps had no effect. Post-training infusion of SR did not affect reversal learning, but short-term memory (1 h post-training) was weaker, and long-term memory for the reversal platform location was enhanced. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic Rimonabant-induced deficits are due to anxiogenic properties of the drug. The difference between administration regimes is discussed in terms of CB(1) receptor blockade in multiple non-memory and memory-related brain regions and the possibility that selective inactivation of hippocampal CB(1) receptors may be memory enhancing.
RATIONALE: As exogenous cannabinoid agonists impair memory formation, could it be that antagonists have opposing effects and act as memory-enhancing drugs? OBJECTIVES: Here, we studied the effects of the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A (SR; Rimonabant) on spatial learning and memory formation and assessed the possible involvement of hippocampal CB(1) receptor in these actions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the water maze, spatial reference memory was probed using different training protocols followed by assessment of behavioral flexibility. The CB(1) receptor antagonist SR (3 mg/kg) was intraperitoneally administered before or immediately after training in experiment 1, or via minipumps intrahippocampally (0.89 ng and 0.089 ng/day) either during or after spatial learning, or subcutaneously in experiment 2. RESULTS: In experiment 1, systemic SR impaired spatial learning when given intraperitoneally (ip) before training coincident with increasing swim speed and thigmotaxis. Pretraining before drug treatment eliminated these effects while post-training injections had no effect. In experiment 2, intrahippocampal infusion of 0.089 ng SR during training enhanced acquisition learning, but did not affect long-term consolidation of spatial memory. In contrast, subcutaneous infusion of SR via minipumps had no effect. Post-training infusion of SR did not affect reversal learning, but short-term memory (1 h post-training) was weaker, and long-term memory for the reversal platform location was enhanced. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic Rimonabant-induced deficits are due to anxiogenic properties of the drug. The difference between administration regimes is discussed in terms of CB(1) receptor blockade in multiple non-memory and memory-related brain regions and the possibility that selective inactivation of hippocampal CB(1) receptors may be memory enhancing.
Authors: G Riedel; J Micheau; A G Lam; E L Roloff; S J Martin; H Bridge; L de Hoz; B Poeschel; J McCulloch; R G Morris Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Mauro Maccarrone; Olga Valverde; Maria L Barbaccia; Anna Castañé; Rafael Maldonado; Catherine Ledent; Marc Parmentier; Alessandro Finazzi-Agrò Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: M Navarro; E Hernández; R M Muñoz; I del Arco; M A Villanúa; M R Carrera; F Rodríguez de Fonseca Journal: Neuroreport Date: 1997-01-20 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: K S Sink; K N Segovia; L E Collins; E J Markus; V K Vemuri; A Makriyannis; J D Salamone Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2010-03-27 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Anushka V Goonawardena; John Sesay; Cheryl Ann Sexton; Gernot Riedel; Robert E Hampson Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Laura E Wise; Stephen A Varvel; Dana E Selley; Jason M Wiebelhaus; Kelly A Long; Lisa S Middleton; Laura J Sim-Selley; Aron H Lichtman Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 4.530