Literature DB >> 18049396

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: complications and conversions with the 3-trocar technique: a 10-year review.

Massimiliano Tuveri1, Augusto Tuveri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) includes the use of 4 trocars. The aim of this study is to show that LC can be performed safely with the 3-trocar technique, thus simplifying a very well-known technique.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1878 patients (male-to-female ratio was 1:3; median age of 44 y) that underwent 3-trocar LC between May 1994 and December 2004.
RESULTS: Three-trocar LC was successful in 1774 patients (94%) with a postoperative morbidity of 1.5% (0.5% of major complications), which includes 2 minor common bile duct lesions (type D according to Strasberg classification) and 1 right common iliac artery laceration. Mortality was nil. Among 249 cases of acute cholecystitis, the 3-trocar LC was successful in 172 patients (70%). The adoption of a fourth trocar was necessary in only 82 patients (4.3%). Conversion to laparotomy occurred in a total of 67 patient (3.5%), 22 of which directly from the 3-trocar technique. The median operating time of the 3-trocar LC was 40 minutes (range, 16 to 130) for chronic cholecystitis, and 80 minutes (range, 30 to 145) for acute cholecystitis. The difference in duration of the surgical procedure between the 2 groups was significant (P<0.05). Severe adhesions were more commonly the reason for conversion (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The study achieves to conclude that the 3-trocar technique can be safely performed, is not technically demanding, and yields in experienced hands a complication rate comparable with the conventional LC. Furthermore, it is less expensive and has a better cosmetic result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18049396     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3180dca5d6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  8 in total

1.  Transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy in clinical practice.

Authors:  Matthias Federlein; Dietmar Borchert; Verena Müller; Yüksel Atas; Frauke Fritze; Jens Burghardt; Dirk Elling; Klaus Gellert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ronald Scott Chamberlain; Sujit Vijay Sakpal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Analysis of gallstone composition and structure in Jharkhand region.

Authors:  Rajani Sharma; Snehi Soy; Chandan Kumar; Shashwati Ghosh Sachan; Shubha Rani Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-15

4.  Are Type and Screen Samples Routinely Necessary Before Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?

Authors:  M L Fong; D Urriza Rodriguez; H Elberm; D P Berry
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Bleeding complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Incidence, mechanisms, prevention and management.

Authors:  Robin Kaushik
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Therapy of gallstone disease: What it was, what it is, what it will be.

Authors:  Piero Portincasa; Agostino Di Ciaula; Leonilde Bonfrate; David Qh Wang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-04-06

7.  Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A review on the complications.

Authors:  Sofie Fransen; L Stassen; N Bouvy
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Novel use of Absorbable Modified Polymer (AMP®); EndoClot™ as an adjunct in the management of bleeding from the liver bed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Pramodh Chitral Chandrasinghe; Asantha De Silva; Kemal Ismail Deen
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-06-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.