Literature DB >> 18047534

On the Bayesian estimation of a closed population size in the presence of heterogeneity and model uncertainty.

R King1, S P Brooks2.   

Abstract

We consider the estimation of the size of a closed population, often of interest for wild animal populations, using a capture-recapture study. The estimate of the total population size can be very sensitive to the choice of model used to fit to the data. We consider a Bayesian approach, in which we consider all eight plausible models initially described by Otis et al. (1978, Wildlife Monographs 62, 1-135) within a single framework, including models containing an individual heterogeneity component. We show how we are able to obtain a model-averaged estimate of the total population, incorporating both parameter and model uncertainty. To illustrate the methodology we initially perform a simulation study and analyze two datasets where the population size is known, before considering a real example relating to a population of dolphins off northeast Scotland.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18047534     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00938.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  9 in total

1.  A review of Bayesian state-space modelling of capture-recapture-recovery data.

Authors:  Ruth King
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Estimating the Sizes of Populations At Risk of HIV Infection From Multiple Data Sources Using a Bayesian Hierarchical Model.

Authors:  Le Bao; Adrian E Raftery; Amala Reddy
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 0.582

3.  Use of Population-Based Surveys for Estimating the Population Size of Persons Who Inject Drugs in the United States.

Authors:  Heather Bradley; Elizabeth M Rosenthal; Meredith A Barranco; Tomoko Udo; Patrick S Sullivan; Eli S Rosenberg
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Bayesian estimation of a cancer population by capture-recapture with individual capture heterogeneity and small sample.

Authors:  Laurent Bailly; Jean Pierre Daurès; Brigitte Dunais; Christian Pradier
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Recapture or precapture? Fallibility of standard capture-recapture methods in the presence of referrals between sources.

Authors:  Hayley E Jones; Matthew Hickman; Nicky J Welton; Daniela De Angelis; Ross J Harris; A E Ades
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  multimark: an R package for analysis of capture-recapture data consisting of multiple "noninvasive" marks.

Authors:  Brett T McClintock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Estimation of capture probabilities using generalized estimating equations and mixed effects approaches.

Authors:  Md Abdus Salam Akanda; Russell Alpizar-Jara
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Estimating species - area relationships by modeling abundance and frequency subject to incomplete sampling.

Authors:  Yuichi Yamaura; Edward F Connor; J Andrew Royle; Katsuo Itoh; Kiyoshi Sato; Hisatomo Taki; Yoshio Mishima
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Multiple Systems Estimation (or Capture-Recapture Estimation) to Inform Public Policy.

Authors:  Sheila M Bird; Ruth King
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.810

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.