Literature DB >> 18047225

Numerosity discrimination in preschool children.

Alzira Almeida1, Joana Arantes, Armando Machado.   

Abstract

We used a numerical bisection procedure to examine preschool children's sensitivity to the numerical attributes of stimuli. In Experiment 1 children performed two tasks. In the Cups Task they earned coins for choosing a green cup after two drumbeats and a blue cup after eight drumbeats. In the Gloves Task they earned coins for raising a red glove on their left hand after two drumbeats and a yellow glove on their right hand after eight drumbeats. Then in each task a psychometric function was obtained by presenting intermediate numerosities and recording the percentage of trials in which children chose the "many" option. In Experiment 2 children's performance in a '2 vs. 8' discrimination was compared with their performance in a "4 vs. 16" discrimination. Results showed that the individual psychometric functions were of two types, one in which the percentage of "many" choices increased gradually with stimulus numerosity and another in which it increased abruptly, in a step-like manner. Although the average point of subjective equality was close to the geometric mean of the anchor numerosities and the average functions for "2 vs. 8" and "4 vs. 16" superimposed when plotted on a common scale (the scalar property), the individual data were highly variable both across tasks (Cups and Gloves) and numerosity ranges ('2 vs. 8' and '4 vs. 16'). It is suggested that between- and within-subjects variability in the psychometric function is related to children's verbalizations about the sample stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18047225      PMCID: PMC2174374          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  How pigeons discriminate the relative frequency of events.

Authors:  R Keen; A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative numerosity discrimination in the pigeon: further tests of the linear-exponential-ratio model.

Authors:  Armando Machado; Richard Keen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  SIGNAL DETECTION IN FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULES.

Authors:  M RILLING; C MCDIARMID
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; R Gelman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-08

5.  Discrimination of relative numerosity and stimulus mixture by pigeons with comparable tasks.

Authors:  W K Honig; W R Matheson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1995-10

6.  A common representational system governed by Weber's law: nonverbal numerical similarity judgments in 6-year-olds and rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Kerry E Jordan; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2006-06-30

7.  Numerosity discrimination: both time and number matter.

Authors:  J G Fetterman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1993-04

8.  Temporal integration in duration and number discrimination.

Authors:  W H Meck; R M Church; J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1985-10

9.  Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules.

Authors:  M Rilling
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-02

10.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes.

Authors:  W H Meck; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1983-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  A quarter century of the analysis of verbal behavior: an analysis of impact.

Authors:  Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir; Sean P Peterson; Anja C Peters
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2009

2.  Human Occipital and Parietal GABA Selectively Influence Visual Perception of Orientation and Size.

Authors:  Chen Song; Kristian Sandberg; Lau Møller Andersen; Jakob Udby Blicher; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.