Literature DB >> 18046761

Multiple testing in the genomics era: findings from Genetic Analysis Workshop 15, Group 15.

Lisa J Martin1, Jessica G Woo, Christy L Avery, Huann-Sheng Chen, Kari E North, Kinman Au, Philippe Broët, Cyril Dalmasso, Mickael Guedj, Peter Holmans, Baisong Huang, Po-Hsiu Kuo, Alex C Lam, Hao Li, Alisa Manning, Ivan Nikolov, Ritwik Sinha, Jianxin Shi, Kijoung Song, Meredith Tabangin, Rui Tang, Ryo Yamada.   

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular technologies have resulted in the ability to screen hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms and tens of thousands of gene expression profiles. While these data have the potential to inform investigations into disease etiologies and advance medicine, the question of how to adequately control both type I and type II error rates remains. Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 datasets provided a unique opportunity for participants to evaluate multiple testing strategies applicable to microarray and single nucleotide polymorphism data. The Genetic Analysis Workshop 15 multiple testing and false discovery rate group (Group 15) investigated three general categories for multiple testing corrections, which are summarized in this review: statistical independence, error rate adjustment, and data reduction. We show that while each approach may have certain advantages, adequate error control is largely dependent upon the question under consideration and often requires the use of multiple analytic strategies. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18046761     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  4 in total

Review 1.  Stem Cell Strategies to Evaluate Idiosyncratic Drug-induced Liver Injury.

Authors:  Winfried Krueger; Urs A Boelsterli; Theodore P Rasmussen
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2014-09-15

2.  Optimal alpha reduces error rates in gene expression studies: a meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  J F Mudge; C J Martyniuk; J E Houlahan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Empirical estimation of genome-wide significance thresholds based on the 1000 Genomes Project data set.

Authors:  Masahiro Kanai; Toshihiro Tanaka; Yukinori Okada
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  A new multitest correction (SGoF) that increases its statistical power when increasing the number of tests.

Authors:  Antonio Carvajal-Rodríguez; Jacobo de Uña-Alvarez; Emilio Rolán-Alvarez
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.