Literature DB >> 18046738

No skin off my back: retribution deficits in psychopathic motives for punishment.

Eyal Aharoni1, Lisa L Weintraub, Alan J Fridlund.   

Abstract

When deciding a criminal's punishment, people typically exhibit both retributive and consequentialist motives in their decision making, though retribution's role may be stronger. This study aimed to discern possible functions of retribution by examining a population predicted to be deficient in retributive drive. Participants who rated either high or low in psychopathic traits read stories about a homicide. These stories were designed to evoke both retribution and the consequentialist motive of behavior control by varying, respectively, criminal intent and likelihood of recidivism. The participants then recommended a length of confinement for the offender. Individuals high in psychopathic traits were uniquely insensitive to retributive cues, and they were particularly consequentialist in their punishment of criminal offenders. These results clarify aspects of psychopathic aggression and corroborate the hypothesis that retribution may stabilize cooperative behavior. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18046738     DOI: 10.1002/bsl.790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Sci Law        ISSN: 0735-3936


  5 in total

1.  Can psychopathic offenders discern moral wrongs? A new look at the moral/conventional distinction.

Authors:  Eyal Aharoni; Walter Sinnott-Armstrong; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2011-08-15

2.  The Brain of Dexter Morgan: the Science of Psychopathy in Showtime's Season 8 of Dexter.

Authors:  Colleen Berryessa; Taylor Goodspeed
Journal:  Am J Crim Justice       Date:  2019-01-17

3.  What's wrong? Moral understanding in psychopathic offenders.

Authors:  Eyal Aharoni; Walter Sinnott-Armstrong; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2014-12

4.  When the killing has been done: Exploring associations of personality with third-party judgment and punishment of homicides in moral dilemma scenarios.

Authors:  Alexander Behnke; Anja Strobel; Diana Armbruster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Slippery scales: Cost prompts, but not benefit prompts, modulate sentencing recommendations in laypeople.

Authors:  Eyal Aharoni; Heather M Kleider-Offutt; Sarah F Brosnan; Sharlene Fernandes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.