Literature DB >> 18046479

The role of oxygen monitoring during photodynamic therapy and its potential for treatment dosimetry.

Josephine H Woodhams1, Alexander J Macrobert, Stephen G Bown.   

Abstract

Understanding of the biology of photodynamic therapy (PDT) has expanded tremendously over the past few years. However, in the clinical situation, it is still a challenge to match the extent of PDT effects to the extent of the disease process being treated. PDT requires drug, light and oxygen, any of which can be the limiting factor in determining efficacy at each point in a target organ. This article reviews techniques available for monitoring tissue oxygenation during PDT. Point measurements can be made using oxygen electrodes or luminescence-based optodes for direct measurements of tissue pO2, or using optical spectroscopy for measuring the oxygen saturation of haemoglobin. Imaging is considerably more complex, but may become feasible with techniques like BOLD MRI. Pre-clinical studies have shown dramatic changes in oxygenation during PDT, which vary with the photosensitizer used and the light delivery regimen. Better oxygenation throughout treatment is achieved if the light fluence rate is kept low as this reduces the rate of oxygen consumption. The relationship between tissue oxygenation and PDT effect is complex and remarkably few studies have directly correlated oxygenation changes during PDT with the final biological effect, although those that have confirm the value of maintaining good oxygenation. Real time monitoring to ensure adequate oxygenation at strategic points in target tissues during PDT is likely to be important, particularly in the image guided treatment of tumours of solid organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18046479     DOI: 10.1039/b709644e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci        ISSN: 1474-905X            Impact factor:   3.982


  14 in total

Review 1.  Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization.

Authors:  Jonathan P Celli; Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Conor L Evans; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sarika Verma; Brian W Pogue; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Photodynamic killing of Enterococcus faecalis in dentinal tubules using mTHPC incorporated in liposomes and invasomes.

Authors:  Anna Ossmann; Stefan Kranz; Guellmar Andre; Andrea Völpel; Volker Albrecht; Alfred Fahr; Bernd W Sigusch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Optical Imaging, Photodynamic Therapy and Optically Triggered Combination Treatments.

Authors:  Srivalleesha Mallidi; Bryan Q Spring; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

4.  Fluence rate-dependent intratumor heterogeneity in physiologic and cytotoxic responses to Photofrin photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Theresa M Busch; Xiaoman Xing; Guoqiang Yu; Arjun Yodh; E Paul Wileyto; Hsing-Wen Wang; Turgut Durduran; Timothy C Zhu; Ken Kang-Hsin Wang
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Lesion oxygenation associates with clinical outcomes in premalignant and early stage head and neck tumors treated on a phase 1 trial of photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Peter H Ahn; Jarod C Finlay; Shannon M Gallagher-Colombo; Harry Quon; Bert W O'Malley; Gregory S Weinstein; Ara Chalian; Kelly Malloy; Thomas Sollecito; Martin Greenberg; Charles B Simone; Sally McNulty; Alexander Lin; Timothy C Zhu; Virginia Livolsi; Michael Feldman; Rosemarie Mick; Keith A Cengel; Theresa M Busch
Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 3.631

6.  Investigating the impact of oxygen concentration and blood flow variation on photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Rozhin Penjweini; Michele M Kim; Jarod C Finlay; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-01

7.  Effect of an oxygen pressure injection (OPI) device on the oxygen saturation of patients during dermatological methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  E Blake; J Allen; C Thorn; A Shore; A Curnow
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  1O2 determined from the measured PDT dose and 3O2 predicts long-term response to Photofrin-mediated PDT.

Authors:  Rozhin Penjweini; Michele M Kim; Yi Hong Ong; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Photodynamic therapy for treatment of solid tumors--potential and technical challenges.

Authors:  Zheng Huang; Heping Xu; Arlen D Meyers; Ali I Musani; Luowei Wang; Randall Tagg; Al B Barqawi; Yang K Chen
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-08

10.  Prediction of tumor recurrence and therapy monitoring using ultrasound-guided photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Srivalleesha Mallidi; Kohei Watanabe; Dmitriy Timerman; David Schoenfeld; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.