Rajiv Agarwal1, Joyce L Davis, Linda Smith. 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, and the Richard L. RoudebushVA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. ragarwal@iupui.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In hemodialysis patients, the hematological response to erythropoietin (epo) is variable and clinical factors that explain this variability are incompletely understood. We tested the hypothesis that the variability in hemoglobin (Hgb) response (epo sensitivity) is determined by key nutritional, inflammation, and oxidative stress markers. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Eighty-two consecutive patients on hemodialysis had 3 consecutive monthly predialysis evaluations of Hgb, total white blood cell (WBC) count, serum albumin, malondialdehyde (MDA), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP1). We analyzed the time course of Hgb in relationship to serum albumin, WBC, MDA, MCP1, epo and iron administration, and tests of iron sufficiency in a linear growth curve model. RESULTS: Subjects with higher Hgb had a fall in Hgb and vice versa, regressing to a mean Hgb (SD) of 11.8 g/dl (1.8 g/dl). Whereas the average slope of Hgb was flat, the SD of slopes was 0.63 g/dl, which explained 39% of the variance in Hgb. Nonuse of epo was associated with a mean Hgb change of -0.18 g/dl (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.26 to -0.10) per 10,000 IU epo/mo (P < 0.05). Epo use was associated with steeper rate of change at 0.04 g/dl per mo per 10,000 IU (95% CI 0.01 to 0.07) (P < 0.01). Hgb at baseline was 0.73 g/dl higher for each 1-g/dl increase in albumin, and the rate of change increased by 0.49 g/dl per mo for each 1-g/dl increase in albumin concentration. WBC, MDA, or MCP1 had no role in predicting the baseline Hgb or its change over time. CONCLUSIONS: Serum albumin concentration is an important predictor of both baseline Hgb and epo sensitivity in chronic hemodialysis patients. Factors that improve serum albumin may also improve Hgb in hemodialysis patients.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In hemodialysis patients, the hematological response to erythropoietin (epo) is variable and clinical factors that explain this variability are incompletely understood. We tested the hypothesis that the variability in hemoglobin (Hgb) response (epo sensitivity) is determined by key nutritional, inflammation, and oxidative stress markers. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Eighty-two consecutive patients on hemodialysis had 3 consecutive monthly predialysis evaluations of Hgb, total white blood cell (WBC) count, serum albumin, malondialdehyde (MDA), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP1). We analyzed the time course of Hgb in relationship to serum albumin, WBC, MDA, MCP1, epo and iron administration, and tests of iron sufficiency in a linear growth curve model. RESULTS: Subjects with higher Hgb had a fall in Hgb and vice versa, regressing to a mean Hgb (SD) of 11.8 g/dl (1.8 g/dl). Whereas the average slope of Hgb was flat, the SD of slopes was 0.63 g/dl, which explained 39% of the variance in Hgb. Nonuse of epo was associated with a mean Hgb change of -0.18 g/dl (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.26 to -0.10) per 10,000 IU epo/mo (P < 0.05). Epo use was associated with steeper rate of change at 0.04 g/dl per mo per 10,000 IU (95% CI 0.01 to 0.07) (P < 0.01). Hgb at baseline was 0.73 g/dl higher for each 1-g/dl increase in albumin, and the rate of change increased by 0.49 g/dl per mo for each 1-g/dl increase in albumin concentration. WBC, MDA, or MCP1 had no role in predicting the baseline Hgb or its change over time. CONCLUSIONS:Serum albumin concentration is an important predictor of both baseline Hgb and epo sensitivity in chronic hemodialysis patients. Factors that improve serum albumin may also improve Hgb in hemodialysis patients.
Authors: N Tessitore; G P Solero; G Lippi; A Bassi; G B Faccini; V Bedogna; L Gammaro; G Brocco; G Restivo; P Bernich; A Lupo; G Maschio Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Daniel W Coyne; Toros Kapoian; Wadi Suki; Ajay K Singh; John E Moran; Naomi V Dahl; Adel R Rizkala Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2007-01-31 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: E Lars Penne; Neelke C van der Weerd; Muriel P C Grooteman; Albert H A Mazairac; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Menso J Nubé; Michiel L Bots; Renée Lévesque; Piet M ter Wee; Peter J Blankestijn Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Lorie B Smith; Jeffrey J Fadrowski; Chanelle J Howe; Barbara A Fivush; Alicia M Neu; Susan L Furth Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Vimal K Derebail; Patrick H Nachman; Nigel S Key; Heather Ansede; Ronald J Falk; Wayne D Rosamond; Abhijit V Kshirsagar Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Christopher R Sudfeld; Sheila Isanaka; Said Aboud; Ferdinand M Mugusi; Molin Wang; Guerino E Chalamilla; Wafaie W Fawzi Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 5.226