Literature DB >> 18045847

Work in the textile industry in Spain and bladder cancer.

C Serra1, M Kogevinas, D T Silverman, D Turuguet, A Tardon, R Garcia-Closas, A Carrato, G Castaño-Vinyals, F Fernandez, P Stewart, F G Benavides, S Gonzalez, A Serra, N Rothman, N Malats, M Dosemeci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: Textile manufacturing is a complex industry that has frequently been associated with bladder cancer. However, results have not been consistent. This study investigated the risk of bladder cancer in Spanish textile workers.
METHODS: We analysed data from a multicentre hospital-based case-control study carried out in Spain (1998-2001) including 1219 cases of bladder cancer and 1271 controls. Of those, 126 cases and 122 controls reported a history of employment in the textile industry. Lifetime occupational history was obtained using a computer-assisted personal interview. Occupations, locations and materials used in the textile industry were assessed using a detailed questionnaire and expert assessment.
RESULTS: Overall, no increased risk of bladder cancer was found for textile workers, including duration of employment analysis. Increased risks were observed for weavers (OR = 1.82, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.47), for workers in winding/warping/sizing (OR 4.11, 95% CI 1.58 to 10.71) and for those exposed to synthetic materials (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.56). Working for more than 10 years appeared to be associated with an increased risk for weavers (OR 2.27, 95% CI 0.97 to 5.34), for those who had ever worked in winding/warping/sizing (OR 11.03, 95% CI 1.37, 88.89), for workers in the weaving room (OR 2.94, 95% CI 1.24 to 7.01) and for those exposed to synthetic (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.14 to 6.01) or cotton (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.87) materials. Statistically significant higher risks were also found for specific combinations of occupations or locations with exposure to synthetics and cotton.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no overall increased risk for textile workers, but increased risks were found for specific groups of workers. Our findings indicate that observed risks in previous studies may be better evaluated by analysis of materials used or section worked within the industry and occupation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18045847     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2007.035667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  5 in total

1.  Occupation and bladder cancer in a population-based case-control study in Northern New England.

Authors:  Joanne S Colt; Margaret R Karagas; Molly Schwenn; Dalsu Baris; Alison Johnson; Patricia Stewart; Castine Verrill; Lee E Moore; Jay Lubin; Mary H Ward; Claudine Samanic; Nathaniel Rothman; Kenneth P Cantor; Laura E Beane Freeman; Alan Schned; Sai Cherala; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Recent advances in the metabolomic study of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Chandra Sekhar Amara; Venkatrao Vantaku; Yair Lotan; Nagireddy Putluri
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  [Identification and selection of diseases of possible occupational origin managed through the National Health System].

Authors:  Fernando G Benavides; Jordi Delclòs Clanchet; Consol Serra Pujades; Lourdes Camp Casals; Losep Lluis de Peray Baiges; Rosa Fernández Bardón
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 4.  Textile industry and occupational cancer.

Authors:  Zorawar Singh; Pooja Chadha
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.646

5.  Silica and asbestos exposure at work and the risk of bladder cancer in Canadian men: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Lidija Latifovic; Paul J Villeneuve; Marie-Élise Parent; Linda Kachuri; Shelley A Harris
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.