BACKGROUND: A hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in children aged 1 month-14 years to identify the proportion of viral encephalitis due to Japanese encephalitis (JE) and compare the clinico-laboratory profile and outcome of JE with that of other viral encephalitis (non-JE). METHODS: All probable cases of viral encephalitis on clinical and laboratory evaluation were confirmed as JE on anti-JE IgM in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or serum. Patients not having anti-JE IgM in CSF and/or serum were diagnosed as having non-JE. RESULTS: Of 94 cases, 58 were JE and 36 non-JE. Although practice of rearing pigs at home was associated with JE (P = 0.0001), significantly higher serum creatinine, protein, aspartate aminotransferase and CSF protein levels were observed in non-JE. Longer duration of fever was associated with complete recovery in JE whereas shorter duration of fever was associated with recovery in non-JE. Risk of neurological sequelae (P = 0.01), especially hemiparesis (P = 0.03) was significantly more in JE. Sequelae were observed at 6 weeks follow up in 18.8% of JE and 13.9% of non-JE. CONCLUSION: JE was the most common cause of viral encephalitis in eastern Nepal and should be suspected in encephalitic patients having pig rearing at home and neurological sequelae. Although duration of hospitalization and complication were higher in JE, final outcome was similar to non-JE. Longer duration of fever in JE and shorter duration of fever in non-JE correlated with recovery, while altered sensorium and focal neurological deficit were independent predictors of sequelae at 6 weeks only in JE and not in non-JE.
BACKGROUND: A hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in children aged 1 month-14 years to identify the proportion of viral encephalitis due to Japanese encephalitis (JE) and compare the clinico-laboratory profile and outcome of JE with that of other viral encephalitis (non-JE). METHODS: All probable cases of viral encephalitis on clinical and laboratory evaluation were confirmed as JE on anti-JE IgM in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or serum. Patients not having anti-JE IgM in CSF and/or serum were diagnosed as having non-JE. RESULTS: Of 94 cases, 58 were JE and 36 non-JE. Although practice of rearing pigs at home was associated with JE (P = 0.0001), significantly higher serum creatinine, protein, aspartate aminotransferase and CSF protein levels were observed in non-JE. Longer duration of fever was associated with complete recovery in JE whereas shorter duration of fever was associated with recovery in non-JE. Risk of neurological sequelae (P = 0.01), especially hemiparesis (P = 0.03) was significantly more in JE. Sequelae were observed at 6 weeks follow up in 18.8% of JE and 13.9% of non-JE. CONCLUSION:JE was the most common cause of viral encephalitis in eastern Nepal and should be suspected in encephaliticpatients having pig rearing at home and neurological sequelae. Although duration of hospitalization and complication were higher in JE, final outcome was similar to non-JE. Longer duration of fever in JE and shorter duration of fever in non-JE correlated with recovery, while altered sensorium and focal neurological deficit were independent predictors of sequelae at 6 weeks only in JE and not in non-JE.
Authors: Penny Lewthwaite; Ashia Begum; Mong How Ooi; Brian Faragher; Boon Foo Lai; Indunil Sandaradura; Anand Mohan; Gaurav Mandhan; Pratibha Meharwade; S Subhashini; Gulia Abhishek; Asma Begum; Srihari Penkulinti; M Veera Shankar; R Ravikumar; Carolyn Young; Mary Jane Cardosa; V Ravi; See Chang Wong; Rachel Kneen; Tom Solomon Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2010-04-19 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Yogita I Tailor; Stacy J Suskauer; Leigh N Sepeta; Joshua B Ewen; Ellen J Dematt; Melissa K Trovato; Cynthia F Salorio; Beth S Slomine Journal: J Pediatr Rehabil Med Date: 2013
Authors: P Gunasekaran; K Kaveri; Kavita Arunagiri; S Mohana; R Kiruba; V Senthil Kumar; P Padmapriya; B V Suresh Babu; A Khaleefathullah Sheriff Journal: Indian J Med Res Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Van Tan Le; Tu Qui Phan; Quang Ha Do; Bach Hue Nguyen; Quoi Bao Lam; Van Cam Bach; Huu Khanh Truong; Tinh Hien Tran; Van Vinh Chau Nguyen; Tan Tram Tran; Minh Hien Vo; Vu Thieu Nga Tran; Constance Schultsz; Jeremy Farrar; H Rogier van Doorn; Menno D de Jong Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2010-10-26
Authors: Ajit Rayamajhi; Imran Ansari; Elizabeth Ledger; Krishna P Bista; Daniel E Impoinvil; Sam Nightingale; Rajendra Kumar; Chandeshwor Mahaseth; Tom Solomon; Michael J Griffiths Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Colin Robertson; Dhan Kumar Pant; Durga Datt Joshi; Minu Sharma; Meena Dahal; Craig Stephen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 3.240