Literature DB >> 18045014

Implications of noise and neural heterogeneity for vestibulo-ocular reflex fidelity.

Timothy M Hospedales1, Mark C W van Rossum, Bruce P Graham, Mayank B Dutia.   

Abstract

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is characterized by a short-latency, high-fidelity eye movement response to head rotations at frequencies up to 20 Hz. Electrophysiological studies of medial vestibular nucleus (MVN) neurons, however, show that their response to sinusoidal currents above 10 to 12 Hz is highly nonlinear and distorted by aliasing for all but very small current amplitudes. How can this system function in vivo when single cell response cannot explain its operation? Here we show that the necessary wide VOR frequency response may be achieved not by firing rate encoding of head velocity in single neurons, but in the integrated population response of asynchronously firing, intrinsically active neurons. Diffusive synaptic noise and the pacemaker-driven, intrinsic firing of MVN cells synergistically maintain asynchronous, spontaneous spiking in a population of model MVN neurons over a wide range of input signal amplitudes and frequencies. Response fidelity is further improved by a reciprocal inhibitory link between two MVN populations, mimicking the vestibular commissural system in vivo, but only if asynchrony is maintained by noise and pacemaker inputs. These results provide a previously missing explanation for the full range of VOR function and a novel account of the role of the intrinsic pacemaker conductances in MVN cells. The values of diffusive noise and pacemaker currents that give optimal response fidelity yield firing statistics similar to those in vivo, suggesting that the in vivo network is tuned to optimal performance. While theoretical studies have argued that noise and population heterogeneity can improve coding, to our knowledge this is the first evidence indicating that these parameters are indeed tuned to optimize coding fidelity in a neural control system in vivo.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18045014     DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.09-06-339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  9 in total

1.  Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass; Robert P O'Shea; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Response linearity of alert monkey non-eye movement vestibular nucleus neurons during sinusoidal yaw rotation.

Authors:  Shawn D Newlands; Nan Lin; Min Wei
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Intrinsic membrane properties of central vestibular neurons in rodents.

Authors:  Daniel Eugène; Erwin Idoux; Mathieu Beraneck; L E Moore; Pierre-Paul Vidal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Synaptic plasticity in medial vestibular nucleus neurons: comparison with computational requirements of VOR adaptation.

Authors:  John R W Menzies; John Porrill; Mayank Dutia; Paul Dean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  In vivo conditions induce faithful encoding of stimuli by reducing nonlinear synchronization in vestibular sensory neurons.

Authors:  Adam D Schneider; Kathleen E Cullen; Maurice J Chacron
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation promotes GABA release in the substantia nigra and improves locomotion in hemiparkinsonian rats.

Authors:  Ghazaleh Samoudi; Hans Nissbrandt; Mayank B Dutia; Filip Bergquist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effect of neural noise on spike time precision in a detailed CA3 neuron model.

Authors:  Eduard Kuriscak; Petr Marsalek; Julius Stroffek; Zdenek Wünsch
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Spike triggered hormone secretion in vasopressin cells; a model investigation of mechanism and heterogeneous population function.

Authors:  Duncan J MacGregor; Gareth Leng
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Pointing to One's Moving Hand: Putative Internal Models Do Not Contribute to Proprioceptive Acuity.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Brian M Wall; Chris R Coffman; Charles Capaday
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.