Literature DB >> 18044973

Effect of 2-fluorohistidine labeling of the anthrax protective antigen on stability, pore formation, and translocation.

D Shyamali Wimalasena1, John C Cramer, Blythe E Janowiak, Stephen J Juris, Roman A Melnyk, D Eric Anderson, Kenneth L Kirk, R John Collier, James G Bann.   

Abstract

The action of anthrax toxin relies in part upon the ability of the protective antigen (PA) moiety to form a heptameric pore in the endosomal membrane, providing a portal for entry of the enzymic moieties of the toxin into the cytosol. Pore formation is dependent on a conformational change in the heptameric prepore that occurs in the neutral to mildly acidic pH range, and it has been hypothesized that protonation of one or more histidine residues triggers this transition. To test this hypothesis, we used biosynthetic methods to incorporate the unnatural amino acid analogue 2-fluorohistidine (2-FHis) into PA. 2-FHis is isosteric with histidine but resists protonation at physiological pH values due to a dramatically reduced side-chain pKa ( approximately 1). We found that 2-FHis-labeled PA was biologically inactive, as judged by its inability to deliver a model intracellular effector, LFN-DTA, to the cytosol of CHO-K1 cells. However, whereas 2-FHis blocked a conformational transition in the full-length PA83 protein in the pH 5-6 range, the pH dependence of prepore-to-pore conversion of (PA63)7 was unchanged from the wild-type protein, implying that this conversion is not dependent on His protonation. Consistent with this result, the labeled, trypsin-activated PA was able to permeabilize liposomes to K+ and retained pore-forming activity in planar phospholipid bilayers. The pores in planar bilayers were incapable, however, of translocating a model ligand in response to a transmembrane pH gradient or elevated voltage. The results indicate that protonation of residues other than His, presumably Glu and/or Asp side chains, triggers pore formation in vitro, but His residues are nonetheless important for PA functioning in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18044973     DOI: 10.1021/bi701763z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  19 in total

1.  History of Chemistry in the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK).

Authors:  Kenneth L Kirk; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  Bull Hist Chem       Date:  2014-01-01

2.  Thioamide hydroxypyrothiones supersede amide hydroxypyrothiones in potency against anthrax lethal factor.

Authors:  Arpita Agrawal; César Augusto F de Oliveira; Yuhui Cheng; Jennifer A Jacobsen; J Andrew McCammon; Seth M Cohen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  The pH-Dependent Trigger in Diphtheria Toxin T Domain Comes with a Safety Latch.

Authors:  Mykola V Rodnin; Jing Li; Michael L Gross; Alexey S Ladokhin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Evidence that histidine protonation of receptor-bound anthrax protective antigen is a trigger for pore formation.

Authors:  D Shyamali Wimalasena; Blythe E Janowiak; Scott Lovell; Masaru Miyagi; Jianjun Sun; Haiying Zhou; Jan Hajduch; Chaya Pooput; Kenneth L Kirk; Kevin P Battaile; James G Bann
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Conformational switching of the diphtheria toxin T domain.

Authors:  Mykola V Rodnin; Alexander Kyrychenko; Paul Kienker; Onkar Sharma; Yevgen O Posokhov; R John Collier; Alan Finkelstein; Alexey S Ladokhin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Monitoring anthrax toxin receptor dissociation from the protective antigen by NMR.

Authors:  Maheshinie Rajapaksha; Jack F Eichler; Jan Hajduch; David E Anderson; Kenneth L Kirk; James G Bann
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Comparison of the structural stability and dynamic properties of recombinant anthrax protective antigen and its 2-fluorohistidine-labeled analogue.

Authors:  Lei Hu; Sangeeta B Joshi; Kiran K Andra; Santosh V Thakkar; David B Volkin; James G Bann; C Russell Middaugh
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  Anthrax toxin protective antigen integrates poly-γ-D-glutamate and pH signals to sense the optimal environment for channel formation.

Authors:  Alexander F Kintzer; Iok I Tang; Adam K Schawel; Michael J Brown; Bryan A Krantz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Biophysical characterization and immunization studies of dominant negative inhibitor (DNI), a candidate anthrax toxin subunit vaccine.

Authors:  Vidyashankara Iyer; Lei Hu; Carole E Schanté; David Vance; Chrystal Chadwick; Nishant Kumar Jain; Robert N Brey; Sangeeta B Joshi; David B Volkin; Kiran K Andra; James G Bann; Nicholas J Mantis; C Russell Middaugh
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  pH effects on binding between the anthrax protective antigen and the host cellular receptor CMG2.

Authors:  Maheshinie Rajapaksha; Scott Lovell; Blythe E Janowiak; Kiran K Andra; Kevin P Battaile; James G Bann
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.