Literature DB >> 18044769

Effect of prophylaxis on fungal infection and costs for high-risk liver transplant recipients.

Alan Reed1, Jill Boylston Herndon, Nail Ersoz, Takahisa Fujikawa, Denise Schain, Paul Lipori, Alan Hemming, Qin Li, Elizabeth Shenkman, Bruce Vogel.   

Abstract

We sought to determine whether the prophylactic use of amphotericin B products (conventional amphotericin B and liposomal amphotericin B) reduces the incidence of fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients, and if so, whether this lowers the cost of care. The study sample comprised 232 adult orthotopic liver transplants performed from 1994 to 2005 at a single center for patients classified as being at high risk for fungal infections. High-risk patients who received transplants with a prophylaxis regimen of amphotericin B (n=58 transplants) were compared with high-risk patients who received no prophylaxis (n=174 transplants). Fungal infections occurred in 3 transplants (5.17%) of those who received amphotericin B and 28 transplants (16.09%) in those without prophylaxis (P=0.0432). Regression models were used to analyze fungal infection and costs for the 232 high-risk transplants. Failure to offer prophylaxis conferred a 4-fold greater risk of fungal infection (P=0.046) compared with those who received amphotericin B. A fungal infection in a high-risk recipient increased mean costs by 46.48%. The indirect effect of prophylaxis (operating through infection reduction) is estimated to reduce overall costs in high-risk patients by 8.73%. Copyright (c) 2007 AASLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18044769     DOI: 10.1002/lt.21331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  5 in total

1.  Mucormycosis in Mato Grosso, Brazil: a case reports, caused by Rhizopus microsporus var. oligosporus and Rhizopus microsporus var. rhizopodiformis.

Authors:  Luciano Corrêa Ribeiro; Bodo Wanke; Manuela da Silva; Luciana Basili Dias; Renato Mello; Fernando Artur Pena Borges Canavarros; Diniz Pereira Leite; Rosane Christine Hahn
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  Immunity of fungal infections alleviated graft reject in liver transplantation compared with non-fungus recipients.

Authors:  Tonghai Xing; Lin Zhong; Lihui Lin; Guoqiang Qiu; Zhihai Peng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-03-01

3.  Targeted versus universal antifungal prophylaxis among liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  G A Eschenauer; E J Kwak; A Humar; B A Potoski; L G Clarke; R K Shields; R Abdel-Massih; F P Silveira; P Vergidis; C J Clancy; M H Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Once weekly fluconazole for antifungal prophylaxis post-liver transplantation.

Authors:  Raelene E Trudeau; Lyndsey J Bowman; Angela R Wills; Jeffrey S Crippin; William C Chapman; Christopher Anderson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Distinct responses of human monocyte subsets to Aspergillus fumigatus conidia.

Authors:  Natalya V Serbina; Mathew Cherny; Chao Shi; Sharon A Bleau; Nancy H Collins; James W Young; Eric G Pamer
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 5.422

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.