Literature DB >> 18044425

Modeling and predicting the growth of lactic acid bacteria in lightly preserved seafood and their inhibiting effect on Listeria monocytogenes.

Ole Mejlholm1, Paw Dalgaard.   

Abstract

A cardinal parameter model was developed to predict the effect of diacetate, lactate, CO2, smoke components (phenol), pH, NaCl, temperature, and the interactions between all parameters on the growth of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in lightly preserved seafood. A product-oriented approach based on careful chemical characterization and growth of bacteria in ready-to-eat seafoods was used to develop this new LAB growth model. Initially, cardinal parameter values for the inhibiting effect of diacetate, lactate, CO2, pH, and NaCl-water activity were determined experimentally for a mixture of LAB isolates or were obtained from the literature. Next, these values and a cardinal parameter model were used to model the effect of temperature (T(min)) and smoke components (P(max)). The cardinal parameter model was fitted to data for growth of LAB (mu(max) values) in lightly preserved seafood including cold-smoked and marinated products with different concentrations of naturally occurring and added organic acids. Separate product validation studies of the LAB model resulted in average bias and accuracy factor values of 1.2 and 1.5, respectively, for growth of LAB (mu(max) values) in lightly preserved seafood. Interaction between LAB and Listeria monocytogenes was predicted by combining the developed LAB model and an existing growth and growth boundary model for the pathogen (O. Mejlholm and P. Dalgaard, J. Food Prot. 70:70-84). The performance of the existing L. monocytogenes model was improved by taking into account the effect of microbial interaction with LAB. The observed and predicted maximum population densities of L. monocytogenes in inoculated lightly preserved seafoods were 4.7 and 4.1 log CFU g(-1), respectively, whereas for naturally contaminated vacuum-packed cold-smoked salmon the corresponding values were 0.7 and 0.6 log CFU g(-1) when a relative lag time of 4.5 was used for the pathogen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18044425     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.11.2485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  5 in total

Review 1.  Predictive Modeling for Estimation of Bacterial Behavior from Farm to Table.

Authors:  Shigenobu Koseki
Journal:  Food Saf (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-06-17

2.  Microbial Safety and Sensory Analyses of Cold-Smoked Salmon Produced with Sodium-Reduced Mineral Salts and Organic Acid Salts.

Authors:  Even Heir; Maria Jacobsen; Mari Øvrum Gaarder; Ingunn Berget; Paw Dalgaard; Merete Rusås Jensen; Askild L Holck
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Modeling the Growth and Interaction Between Brochothrix thermosphacta, Pseudomonas spp., and Leuconostoc gelidum in Minced Pork Samples.

Authors:  Emilie Cauchie; Laurent Delhalle; Ghislain Baré; Assia Tahiri; Bernard Taminiau; Nicolas Korsak; Sophie Burteau; Papa Abdoulaye Fall; Frédéric Farnir; Georges Daube
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Use of Food Spoilage and Safety Predictor for an "A Priori" Modeling of the Growth of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Fermented Smoked Fish Products.

Authors:  Angela Racioppo; Daniela Campaniello; Milena Sinigaglia; Antonio Bevilacqua; Barbara Speranza; Maria Rosaria Corbo
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-03-25

5.  The STARTEC Decision Support Tool for Better Tradeoffs between Food Safety, Quality, Nutrition, and Costs in Production of Advanced Ready-to-Eat Foods.

Authors:  Taran Skjerdal; Andras Gefferth; Miroslav Spajic; Edurne Gaston Estanga; Alessandra De Cesare; Silvia Vitali; Frederique Pasquali; Federica Bovo; Gerardo Manfreda; Rocco Mancusi; Marcello Trevisiani; Girum Tadesse Tessema; Tone Fagereng; Lena Haugland Moen; Lars Lyshaug; Anastasios Koidis; Gonzalo Delgado-Pando; Alexandros Ch Stratakos; Marco Boeri; Cecilie From; Hyat Syed; Mirko Muccioli; Roberto Mulazzani; Catherine Halbert
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.